These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
794 related items for PubMed ID: 11022773
1. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration. Rosetti EP, Marcantonio RA, Rossa C, Chaves ES, Goissis G, Marcantonio E. J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1441-7. PubMed ID: 11022773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Root coverage stability of the subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration: a 30-month follow-up clinical trial. Rosetti EP, Marcantonio E, Zuza EP, Marcantonio RA. J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 22652007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study. Paolantonio M. J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft. Romagna-Genon C. J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1258-64. PubMed ID: 11577960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects. Trombelli L, Scabbia A, Tatakis DN, Calura G. J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1271-7. PubMed ID: 9848537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession. Wang HL, Bunyaratavej P, Labadie M, Shyr Y, MacNeil RL. J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession. Borghetti A, Glise JM, Monnet-Corti V, Dejou J. J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10102549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a semilunar coronally positioned flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession. Bittencourt S, Del Peloso Ribeiro E, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Nociti FH, Casati MZ. J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 16460241 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study. Bittencourt S, Ribeiro Edel P, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Nociti FH, Casati MZ. J Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):1076-82. PubMed ID: 19563287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative clinical study of connective tissue graft and two types of bioabsorbable barriers in the treatment of localized gingival recessions. Cetiner D, Parlar A, Baloş K, Alpar R. J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1196-205. PubMed ID: 14514234 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of root coverage with connective tissue and platelet concentrate grafts: 8-month results. Cheung WS, Griffin TJ. J Periodontol; 2004 Dec; 75(12):1678-87. PubMed ID: 15732871 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gingival recession treatment: guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft. Tatakis DN, Trombelli L. J Periodontol; 2000 Feb; 71(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 10711621 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten-year results after connective tissue grafts and guided tissue regeneration for root coverage. Nickles K, Ratka-Krüger P, Neukranz E, Raetzke P, Eickholz P. J Periodontol; 2010 Jun; 81(6):827-36. PubMed ID: 20450359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial. Bittencourt S, Del Peloso Ribeiro E, Sallum EA, Nociti FH, Casati MZ. J Periodontol; 2012 Jun; 83(6):721-30. PubMed ID: 21870975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage. Ricci G, Silvestri M, Tinti C, Rasperini G. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Dec; 16(6):538-45. PubMed ID: 9242092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions. Cordioli G, Mortarino C, Chierico A, Grusovin MG, Majzoub Z. J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1470-6. PubMed ID: 11759857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of the epithelial collar on the subepithelial connective tissue graft. Byun HY, Oh TJ, Abuhussein HM, Yamashita J, Soehren SE, Wang HL. J Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 80(6):924-32. PubMed ID: 19485822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession. Rahmani ME, Lades MA. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May 01; 7(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16685296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage. Ito K, Oshio K, Shiomi N, Murai S. Quintessence Int; 2000 May 01; 31(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 11203942 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of gingival recessions: a 5-year randomized clinical study. Moslemi N, Mousavi Jazi M, Haghighati F, Morovati SP, Jamali R. J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Dec 01; 38(12):1122-9. PubMed ID: 22092784 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]