These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

273 related items for PubMed ID: 11044042

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Volume-artifact reduction technique by spiral CT in the anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae. Comparison with conventional cranial CT].
    Dorenbeck U, Finkenzeller T, Hill K, Feuerbach S, Link J.
    Rofo; 2000 Apr; 172(4):342-5. PubMed ID: 10961218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Image quality of multisection CT of the brain: thickly collimated sequential scanning versus thinly collimated spiral scanning with image combining.
    van Straten M, Venema HW, Majoie CB, Freling NJ, Grimbergen CA, den Heeten GJ.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Mar; 28(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 17353306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Three-dimensional craniocervical helical CT: is isotropic imaging possible?
    Levy RA.
    Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):645-8. PubMed ID: 7480732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ghosting of pulmonary nodules with respiratory motion: comparison of helical and conventional CT using an in vitro pediatric model.
    Luker GD, Bae KT, Siegel MJ, Don S, Brink JA, Wang G, Herman TE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1189-93. PubMed ID: 8911178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. CT chest and gantry rotation time: does the rotation time influence image quality?
    Beeres M, Wichmann JL, Paul J, Mbalisike E, Elsabaie M, Vogl TJ, Nour-Eldin NE.
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):950-4. PubMed ID: 25140057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Advanced modelled iterative reconstruction for abdominal CT: qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
    Gordic S, Desbiolles L, Stolzmann P, Gantner L, Leschka S, Husarik DB, Alkadhi H.
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Dec; 69(12):e497-504. PubMed ID: 25239788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The optimization of helical thoracic CT.
    Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Wise SW, TenHave TR, Hills JR, Mahraj RM, Wilson RP, Weaver JS.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998 Dec; 22(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 9606383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Lung cancer screening: minimum tube current required for helical CT.
    Itoh S, Ikeda M, Arahata S, Kodaira T, Isomura T, Kato T, Yamakawa K, Maruyama K, Ishigaki T.
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 10751484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images.
    Bajpai V, Lee KH, Kim B, Kim KJ, Kim TJ, Kim YH, Kang HS.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W38-43. PubMed ID: 18647884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.