These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

207 related items for PubMed ID: 11044536

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A, Bagga R, Jasvinder Kalra, Jain V, Saha SC, Kumar P.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Local administration of prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labor induction: the appropriate route and dose.
    Nuutila M, Kajanoja P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Feb; 75(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8604599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
    Triglia MT, Palamara F, Lojacono A, Prefumo F, Frusca T.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R, Suri V, Ray P, Gupta I.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
    Facchinetti F, Venturini P, Fazzio M, Volpe A.
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R, Greaves PC.
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Pre-induction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 gel: intracervical versus intravaginal route.
    Zanini A, Ghidini A, Norchi S, Beretta E, Cortinovis I, Bottino S.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):681-3. PubMed ID: 2216204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized prospective comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravaginal and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel.
    Stempel JE, Prins RP, Dean S.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1305-9; discussion 1309-12. PubMed ID: 9215189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil.
    Chyu JK, Strassner HT.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):606-11. PubMed ID: 9322631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Pharmacological induction of labour: benefits and risks].
    Romanelli M, Ribiani E, Burnelli L, Luzi G, Affronti G, Di Renzo GC.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17923826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
    Grange J, Dimet J, Vital M, Le Thuaut A, Ducarme G.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications].
    Nikolov A, Dimitrov A, Krŭsteva K, Nashar S.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003 Oct; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
    Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Melamed N, Manor Y, Wiznitzer A, Hod M, Yogev Y.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P, Puri M, Bajaj M, Mishra A, Trivedi SS.
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Double-blind comparison of intracervical and intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Hales KA, Rayburn WF, Turnbull GL, Christensen HD, Patatanian E.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1087-91. PubMed ID: 7943076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.