These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 11045798

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps.
    Cartwright JA, Hill TL, Smith S, Shaw D.
    J Vet Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 30(4):1002-7. PubMed ID: 27255591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The difficulty of reprocessing reusable rigid laparoscopic forceps and other endoscopic accessories: are disposables the answer?
    Health Devices; 1994 Jul; 23(1-2):57-8. PubMed ID: 8169151
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Comparison of Pelican single-use multibite biopsy forceps and traditional double-bite forceps: evaluation in a porcine model.
    Zaidman JS, Frederick WG, Furth EE, Su CG, Ginsberg GG.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Oct; 64(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 16996354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of costs.
    Kozarek RA, Raltz SL, Merriam LD, Sumida SE.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Jan; 43(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 8903810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Circadian variations of rectal cell proliferation in patients affected by advanced colorectal cancer.
    Brandi G, Calabrese C, Pantaleo MA, Morselli Labate A, Di Febo G, Hakim R, De Vivo A, Di Marco MC, Biasco G.
    Cancer Lett; 2004 May 28; 208(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 15142678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Bionic Design of a Disposable Compliant Surgical Forceps With Optimized Clamping Performance.
    Sun Y, Zhang D, Lueth TC.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul 28; 2020():4704-4707. PubMed ID: 33019042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Manual methods are suboptimal compared with automated methods for cleaning of single-use biopsy forceps.
    Alfa MJ, Nemes R, Olson N, Mulaire A.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Aug 28; 27(8):841-6. PubMed ID: 16874645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The valve design of disposable and reusable trocars.
    O'Rourke NA.
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Feb 28; 3(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 7757439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Rectal biopsy: what is the optimal procedure?
    Kobayashi H, Li Z, Yamataka A, Lane GJ, Miyano T.
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2002 Dec 28; 18(8):753-6. PubMed ID: 12598984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
    Yimyam S, Srisuphan W, Plianpadung S, Senaratana W.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul 28; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A comparison between disposable and reusable single fiber needle electrodes in relation to stimulated single fiber studies.
    Papathanasiou ES, Zamba-Papanicolaou E.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jul 28; 123(7):1437-9. PubMed ID: 22119663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A system of multiple biopsy forceps.
    Taylor TV.
    Curr Surg; 2004 Jul 28; 61(6):594-6. PubMed ID: 15590032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.