These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 11045798

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Assessment of a disposable trocar for insertion of contraceptive implants.
    Steiner MJ, Boler T, Obhai G, Hubacher D.
    Contraception; 2010 Feb; 81(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 20103452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.
    Nanta P, Senarat W, Tribuddharat C, Danchaivijitr S.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Oval Cup Forceps Versus Serrated Jaw Forceps in Gastric Biopsy.
    Sussman DA, Deshpande AR, Shankar U, Barkin JA, Medina AM, Poppiti RJ, Cubeddu LX, Barkin JS.
    Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Aug; 61(8):2338-2343. PubMed ID: 27003145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. [Single-use biopsy forceps for digestive endoscopy: a wise decision or a caricature of precaution principles?].
    Sautereau D, Palazzo L.
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001 Aug; 25(6-7):653-5. PubMed ID: 11673730
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs.
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Study deems single-use instruments more cost-effective than reusable in lap choly procedures.
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1995 Jul; 20(7):18-9. PubMed ID: 10172368
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs.
    Hickey M, Fields M.
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Performance of disposable endoscopic forceps according to the manufacturing techniques.
    Kwon CI, Kim G, Moon JP, Yun H, Ko WJ, Cho JY, Hong SP.
    Korean J Intern Med; 2019 May; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 29502363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Reliability of whole crypt mitotic count as a measure of cellular proliferation in rectal biopsies.
    Tosteson TD, Karagas MR, Rothstein R, Ahnen DJ, Greenberg ER.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jun; 5(6):437-9. PubMed ID: 8781739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.