These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

136 related items for PubMed ID: 1106093

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bacteriophage typing of Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, and Proteus morganii.
    Schmidt WC, Jeffries CD.
    Appl Microbiol; 1974 Jan; 27(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 4589141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Efficiency of a multitest system (Enterotube) for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Titsworth E, Grunberg E, Beskid G, Cleeland R, Delorenzo WF.
    Appl Microbiol; 1969 Aug; 18(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 4979941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparative evaluation of two proteocine typing schemes.
    Rao RS, Sundararaj T, Subramanian S, Paramasivan CN.
    Indian J Med Res; 1981 Jul; 74():11-2. PubMed ID: 7030941
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Bacteriocin types of Proteus isolated from diagnostic specimens].
    Gołuszko P, Grabowska A.
    Przegl Epidemiol; 1985 Jul; 39(3-4):406-11. PubMed ID: 3913990
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Enteric bacterial interactions in insects.
    Greenberg B, Klowden M.
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1972 Dec; 25(12):1459-66. PubMed ID: 4629542
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of multiple-test systems for the presumptive identification of enterobacteriaceae.
    Goldin M.
    Am J Med Technol; 1972 Aug; 38(8):288-91. PubMed ID: 4563216
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. DIFFERENTIATION OF ENTERAL BACTERIA BY THE ALKALINE REACTION.
    SERENY B.
    Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung; 1963 Aug; 10():277-85. PubMed ID: 14108401
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Differentiation of selected Enterobacteriaceae by pyrolysis-gas-liquid chromatography.
    Stern NJ, Kotula AW, Pierson MD.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1979 Dec; 38(6):1098-102. PubMed ID: 393169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Taxonomic significance of the lipopolysaccharide fatty acid composition of bacteria in the genus Proteus].
    Cherniavskaia EN, Vasiurenko ZP.
    Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Biol; 1984 Dec; (5):784-90. PubMed ID: 6389642
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Gentamicin susceptibility of gram-negative problem germs and staphylococci, indicated by the tube dilution method].
    Modde H.
    Pathol Microbiol (Basel); 1972 Dec; 38(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 4565703
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.