These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
155 related items for PubMed ID: 11063658
1. Predictive factors for residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for CIN III. Lu CH, Liu FS, Tseng JJ, Ho ES. Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 11063658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer. Park JY, Lee SM, Yoo CW, Kang S, Park SY, Seo SS. Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17582476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III. Lu CH, Liu FS, Kuo CJ, Chang CC, Ho ES. Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients. Sun XG, Ma SQ, Zhang JX, Wu M. Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb 20; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence and risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP or conization. Natee J, Therasakvichaya S, Boriboonhirunsarn D. J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct 20; 88(10):1344-8. PubMed ID: 16519377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of endocervical curettage after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Schneider P, von Orelli S, Roos M, Leo C, Fink D, Wyss P. Ann Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug 20; 16(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 22115536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature. Hefler LA, Polterauer S, Schneitter A, Concin N, Hofstetter G, Bentz E, Leipold H, Tempfer C, Reinthaller A. Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb 20; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens. An J, Lei H, Xie X, Sun P. Oncol Res Treat; 2020 Feb 20; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization. Wang X, Xu J, Gao Y, Qu P. BMC Womens Health; 2021 May 07; 21(1):191. PubMed ID: 33962590 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Denehy TR, Gregori CA, Breen JL. Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul 07; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing after conization in the prediction of residual disease in the subsequent hysterectomy specimen. Lin CT, Tseng CJ, Lai CH, Hsueh S, Huang KG, Huang HJ, Chao A. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr 07; 184(5):940-5. PubMed ID: 11303202 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]