These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

186 related items for PubMed ID: 11067601

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ.
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993 May; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ.
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993 May; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Rationality and the refusal of medical treatment: a critique of the recent approach of the English courts.
    Stauch M.
    J Med Ethics; 1995 Jun; 21(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 7674281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Ethical, legal, and psychiatric issues in capacity, competency, and informed consent: an annotated bibliography.
    Zaubler TS, Viederman M, Fins JJ.
    Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 1996 May; 18(3):155-72. PubMed ID: 8739009
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The retreat from Gillick.
    Douglas G.
    Mod Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 55(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 16977738
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Can a patient refuse a psychiatric consultation to evaluate decision-making capacity?
    Wenger NS, Halpern J.
    J Clin Ethics; 1994 Jul; 5(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 7841473
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness.
    Winick BJ.
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 51(1):57-95. PubMed ID: 11660621
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Religious issues in the capacity evaluation.
    Waldfogel S, Meadows S.
    Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 1996 May; 18(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 8739010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Public psychiatry and the right to refuse treatment: toward an effective damage remedy.
    Furrow BR.
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1984 May; 19(1):21-60. PubMed ID: 11658667
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The US Supreme Court looks at voluntariness and consent.
    Miller RD.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994 May; 17(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 7995684
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Decisions by and for people with mental retardation: balancing considerations of autonomy and protection.
    Ellis JW.
    Villanova Law Rev; 1992 May; 37(6):1779-809. PubMed ID: 11654415
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.