These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

435 related items for PubMed ID: 11075969

  • 1. A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Charoenkul S, Sripramote M.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1026-34. PubMed ID: 11075969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH, Chang FM.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Paisarntantiwong R, Getgan M.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term.
    Chitrakar NS.
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2012 Jan; 10(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 22929629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R, Greaves PC.
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P, Porter B, Ferri N, Summers J, Templeton A.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA, Loughney AD, Weir CJ, Barber JW.
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N, Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Punyavachira P.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Ham D, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
    Tan TC, Yan SY, Chua TM, Biswas A, Chong YS.
    BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Alfirevic Z.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Diro M, Adra A, Gilles JM, Nassar A, Rodriguez A, Salamat SM, Beydoun SN, O'Sullivan MJ, Yasin SY, Burkett G.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1999 Aug; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.