These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
165 related items for PubMed ID: 11084914
21. BALLDock/SLICK: a new method for protein-carbohydrate docking. Kerzmann A, Fuhrmann J, Kohlbacher O, Neumann D. J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1616-25. PubMed ID: 18646839 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Protein-protein docking in CAPRI using ATTRACT to account for global and local flexibility. May A, Zacharias M. Proteins; 2007 Dec 01; 69(4):774-80. PubMed ID: 17803217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Characterization by NMR and molecular modeling of the binding of polyisoprenols and polyisoprenyl recognition sequence peptides: 3D structure of the complexes reveals sites of specific interactions. Zhou GP, Troy FA. Glycobiology; 2003 Feb 01; 13(2):51-71. PubMed ID: 12626407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 3. Impact of input ligand conformation, protein flexibility, and water molecules on the accuracy of docking programs. Corbeil CR, Moitessier N. J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr 01; 49(4):997-1009. PubMed ID: 19391631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Localization of the antimitotic peptide and depsipeptide binding site on beta-tubulin. Mitra A, Sept D. Biochemistry; 2004 Nov 09; 43(44):13955-62. PubMed ID: 15518544 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP-protein binding: a new criterion to rank docking solutions. Pyrkov TV, Kosinsky YA, Arseniev AS, Priestle JP, Jacoby E, Efremov RG. Proteins; 2007 Feb 01; 66(2):388-98. PubMed ID: 17094116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of input differences on the results of docking calculations. Feher M, Williams CI. J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul 01; 49(7):1704-14. PubMed ID: 19530660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]