These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


369 related items for PubMed ID: 11090665

  • 21. Apparent motion of monocular stimuli in different depth planes with lateral head movements.
    Shimono K, Tam WJ, Ono H.
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(8):1027-35. PubMed ID: 17337029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
    Brooks KR, Gillam BJ.
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size.
    Bradshaw MF, Parton AD, Eagle RA.
    Perception; 1998 Mar; 27(11):1317-31. PubMed ID: 10505177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Perceived speed of motion in depth is reduced in the periphery.
    Brooks K, Mather G.
    Vision Res; 2000 Mar; 40(25):3507-16. PubMed ID: 11115678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax.
    Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):404-15. PubMed ID: 12760624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A simple integrative method for presenting head-contingent motion parallax and disparity cues on intel x86 processor-based machines.
    Szatmary J, Hadani I, Julesz B.
    Spat Vis; 1997 Apr; 11(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 9304752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The swinging doors of perception: stereomotion without binocular matching.
    Brooks KR, Gillam BJ.
    J Vis; 2006 Jun 16; 6(7):685-95. PubMed ID: 16895452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.
    Harris JM, Wilcox LM.
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov 16; 49(22):2666-85. PubMed ID: 19577589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Human observers are biased in judging the angular approach of a projectile.
    Welchman AE, Tuck VL, Harris JM.
    Vision Res; 2004 Nov 16; 44(17):2027-42. PubMed ID: 15149836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Isotropic integration of binocular disparity and relative motion in the perception of three-dimensional shape.
    Hibbard PB, Bradshaw MF.
    Spat Vis; 2002 Nov 16; 15(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 11991575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Flash lag in depth.
    Harris LR, Duke PA, Kopinska A.
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep 16; 46(17):2735-42. PubMed ID: 16469350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Perception of depth and motion from ambiguous binocular information.
    Sakai K, Ogiya M, Hirai Y.
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep 16; 45(19):2471-80. PubMed ID: 15961137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Cue vetoing in depth estimation: Physical and virtual stimuli.
    Hartle B, Wilcox LM.
    Vision Res; 2021 Nov 16; 188():51-64. PubMed ID: 34289419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Motion in depth based on inter-ocular velocity differences.
    Shioiri S, Saisho H, Yaguchi H.
    Vision Res; 2000 Nov 16; 40(19):2565-72. PubMed ID: 10958908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Interaction of stereo vision and optic flow processing revealed by an illusory stimulus.
    Grigo A, Lappe M.
    Vision Res; 1998 Jan 16; 38(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 9536354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.