These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


313 related items for PubMed ID: 11092486

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP.
    Chen RC, Lin KY, Lii JM, Yang MT, Chen WT, Tu HY, Wang CS.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 102(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12783134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
    Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM.
    Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9530295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in malignant pancreaticobiliary obstruction.
    Georgopoulos SK, Schwartz LH, Jarnagin WR, Gerdes H, Breite I, Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Kurtz RC.
    Arch Surg; 1999 Sep; 134(9):1002-7. PubMed ID: 10487597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Improvement of MR cholangiopancreatography at .5 T: three-dimensional half-averaged single-shot fast spin echo with multi-breath-hold technique.
    Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hanaoka H, Kassai Y, Nitatori T, Hachiya J, Araki T.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Sep; 8(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 9562076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
    Alcaraz MJ, De la Morena EJ, Polo A, Ramos A, De la Cal MA, González Mandly A.
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and two-dimensional turbo spin-echo pulse sequences.
    Kim TK, Han JK, Kim SJ, Bae SH, Choi BI.
    Abdom Imaging; 1998 Jul; 23(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 9663276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical impact of MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary disease.
    Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M, Marinelli T, Pinto D, Maggialetti A.
    Radiol Med; 2003 Jul; 105(1-2):27-35. PubMed ID: 12700542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique.
    Yamashita Y, Abe Y, Tang Y, Urata J, Sumi S, Takahashi M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1449-54. PubMed ID: 9168706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
    Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF, Banting SW, Smith PJ, Desmond PV.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
    Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H, Hammerstingl R, Vogl T, Felix R.
    Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.