These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

103 related items for PubMed ID: 1109814

  • 1. [Methods and working style of expert commissions. With reference to findings and experiences of the Regional Expert Commission in the North Moravian Region].
    Ficker L, Neoral Z.
    Cesk Zdrav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 1109814
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Experience from expert testimony commissions on gynecologico-obstetrical problems from the viewpoint of the forensic physician].
    Porubský V.
    Cesk Gynekol; 1975 Dec; 40(10):691-2. PubMed ID: 1204010
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Expert commission for questions of physician malpractice. More than 10 years service for the patient and physician--report from the Südbaden District Chamber of Medicine].
    Freund JF, Freund UH, Farthmann EH.
    Fortschr Med; 1990 Nov 20; 108(33):633-7. PubMed ID: 2289732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Loss of fertility in woman from the forensic aspect (author's transl)].
    Veselý K.
    Cesk Gynekol; 1975 Dec 20; 40(10):717. PubMed ID: 1204027
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
    Grubbs WG.
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986 Dec 20; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed.
    Kessenick LW, Mankin PA.
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973 Dec 20; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [The responsibility of settlement courts and expert commissions].
    Eberhardt L.
    Gynakologe; 1989 Dec 20; 22(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 2696706
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Necessity for expert testimony in malpractice actions.
    COLEMAN WT.
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1951 Jan 20; 43(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 14804112
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Paternity from the obstetrical viewpoint - expert testimony].
    Lindner E, Nevrla F.
    Cesk Gynekol; 1975 Dec 20; 40(10):699-700. PubMed ID: 1204014
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. MALPRACTICE: need for expert testimony.
    J Am Med Assoc; 1951 Feb 24; 145(8):585. PubMed ID: 14794493
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Expert judicial opinions in questions of liability].
    Quenu L.
    Chirurgie; 1980 Feb 24; 106(7):555-6. PubMed ID: 7438880
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dental practice and expert testimony.
    Bull Phila Cty Dent Soc; 1967 Nov 24; 33(2):4. PubMed ID: 5236391
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.