These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

164 related items for PubMed ID: 11102569

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Lidocaine inactivation of the ventral pallidum affects responding for brain stimulation reward more than it affects the stimulation's reward value.
    Waraczynski M, Demco C.
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Oct 16; 173(2):288-98. PubMed ID: 16890301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Lesions and inactivation implicate dorsolateral hindbrain in MFB self-stimulation.
    Acheson A, Waraczynski M, Perkins M.
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Oct 16; 71(1-2):159-71. PubMed ID: 11134698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. CaV1.3 channel blockade in the extended amygdala has a delayed effect on the reward efficacy of medial forebrain bundle stimulation.
    Waraczynski M, Abbott S, Schultz AV.
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan 15; 317():485-493. PubMed ID: 27743939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Lesions of midline midbrain structures leave medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation intact.
    Waraczynski M, Perkins M, Acheson A.
    Behav Brain Res; 1999 Sep 15; 103(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 10513585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Attenuation of medical forebrain bundle reward by anterior lateral hypothalamic lesions.
    Murray B, Shizgal P.
    Behav Brain Res; 1996 Feb 15; 75(1-2):33-47. PubMed ID: 8800658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Rewarding effectiveness of caudal MFB stimulation is unaltered following DMH lesions.
    Waraczynski M, Conover K, Shizgal P.
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Aug 15; 52(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 1523244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effects of feeding and rewarding brain stimulation on lateral hypothalamic unit activity in freely moving rats.
    Sasaki K, Ono T, Muramoto K, Nishino H, Fukuda M.
    Brain Res; 1984 Nov 26; 322(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 6150748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Basal forebrain knife cuts and medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation.
    Waraczynski MA.
    Brain Res; 1988 Jan 12; 438(1-2):8-22. PubMed ID: 3257893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Destruction of the medial forebrain bundle caudal to the site of stimulation reduces rewarding efficacy but destruction rostrally does not.
    Gallistel CR, Leon M, Lim BT, Sim JC, Waraczynski M.
    Behav Neurosci; 1996 Aug 12; 110(4):766-90. PubMed ID: 8864268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Interhemispheric involvement of the anterior cortical nuclei of the amygdala in rewarding brain stimulation.
    Miguelez M, Kentner AC, Deslauriers K, Parkinson M, Fouriezos G, Bielajew C.
    Brain Res; 2004 Apr 02; 1003(1-2):138-50. PubMed ID: 15019573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.