These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

378 related items for PubMed ID: 11105006

  • 1. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays.
    Denissen H, Dozić A, van der Zel J, van Waas M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 11105006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Computer copings for partial coverage.
    Denissen H, van der Zel J, Reisig J, Vlaar S, de Ruiter W, van Waas R.
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Apr; 2(2):113-27. PubMed ID: 11351490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Interface dimensions of CEREC-3 MOD onlays.
    Wang WC, McDonald A, Petrie A, Setchell D.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Dec; 15(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 18236930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations.
    Bindl A, Mörmann WH.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 32(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 15899023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [CAD/CAM-copings for partial coverage].
    Denissen HW, van der Zel JM, van Waas MA.
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Feb; 106(2):38-41. PubMed ID: 11930340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD.
    J Prosthodont; 2006 Feb; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D.
    da Costa JB, Pelogia F, Hagedorn B, Ferracane JL.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Feb; 35(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20533633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E, Suárez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P, Kee E, Chiche GJ, Blatz MB.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T, Schneider D.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of fit adjustment on CEREC CAD-CAM veneers.
    White SN, Suh PS, Yu Z, Johnson R.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 9545921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T, De Nisco S.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns.
    Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Dec; 16(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 12854786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype.
    Reich S, Gozdowski S, Trentzsch L, Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Dec; 33(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 19051857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
    Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR.
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Marginal adaptation of full-coverage CAD/CAM restorations: in vitro study using a non-destructive method.
    Romeo E, Iorio M, Storelli S, Camandona M, Abati S.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):61-72. PubMed ID: 19357612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing.
    Luthardt RG, Bornemann G, Lemelson S, Walter MH, Hüls A.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 17(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 15686096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, Khalilinejad F, Alihemmati M, Van Noort R.
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.