These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
169 related items for PubMed ID: 11108192
1. Improved culture methods for isolation of Salmonella organisms from swine feces. Hoorfar J, Mortensen AV. Am J Vet Res; 2000 Nov; 61(11):1426-9. PubMed ID: 11108192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of cultivation and PCR-hybridization for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal and water samples. Feder I, Nietfeld JC, Galland J, Yeary T, Sargeant JM, Oberst R, Tamplin ML, Luchansky JB. J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 39(7):2477-84. PubMed ID: 11427557 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity and specificity of different methods for the isolation of Salmonella from pigs. Bager F, Petersen J. Acta Vet Scand; 1991 Jul; 32(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 1818506 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bacterial culture and real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella in grow-finish pigs in Western Canada using a Bayesian approach. Wilkins W, Waldner C, Rajić A, McFall M, Muckle A, Mainar-Jaime RC. Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Nov; 57 Suppl 1():115-20. PubMed ID: 21083825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of the diagnostic accuracy of the invA-gene-based PCR technique and a bacteriological culture for the detection of Salmonella spp. in caecal content from slaughtered pigs using Bayesian analysis. Mainar-Jaime RC, Atashparvar N, Chirino-Trejo M. Zoonoses Public Health; 2008 Nov; 55(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 18234030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolation of Salmonella from environmental samples collected in the reptile department of Antwerp Zoo using different selective methods. Bauwens L, Vercammen F, Bertrand S, Collard JM, De Ceuster S. J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 101(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 16882135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of five culture methods for Salmonella isolation from swine fecal samples of known infection status. Love BC, Rostagno MH. J Vet Diagn Invest; 2008 Sep; 20(5):620-4. PubMed ID: 18776096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry. Hoorfar J, Baggesen DL. FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1998 Dec 01; 169(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 9851043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 7 culture methods for Salmonella serovar Enteritidis and Salmonella serovar Typhimurium isolation in poultry feces. Rodríguez FI, Procura F, Bueno DJ. Poult Sci; 2018 Nov 01; 97(11):3826-3836. PubMed ID: 29945189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved isolation of salmonellae from faeces using a semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium. Aspinall ST, Hindle MA, Hutchinson DN. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Oct 01; 11(10):936-9. PubMed ID: 1336727 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of salmonellae in chicken feces by a combination of tetrathionate broth enrichment, capillary PCR, and capillary gel electrophoresis. Carli KT, Unal CB, Caner V, Eyigor A. J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May 01; 39(5):1871-6. PubMed ID: 11326006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between semisolid Rappaport and modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis media for the isolation of Salmonella spp. from foods and feeds. Perales I, Erkiaga E. Int J Food Microbiol; 1991 Oct 01; 14(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 1742172 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]