These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

169 related items for PubMed ID: 11108192

  • 21. A comparison of two methods for isolation of Salmonella from poultry litter samples.
    Read SC, Irwin RJ, Poppe C, Harris J.
    Poult Sci; 1994 Oct; 73(10):1617-21. PubMed ID: 7816738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparison of selective enrichment media for the detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces.
    Voogt N, Raes M, Wannet WJ, Henken AM, van de Giessen AW.
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2001 Feb; 32(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 11169049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Evaluation of methods for isolation of Salmonella species using modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium and Salmonella-Shigella agar.
    Ruiz Gomez J, Lorente Salinas I, Perez Salmerón J, Simarro Cordoba E, Martinez Campos L.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Nov; 17(11):791-3. PubMed ID: 9923522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Enrichment for isolating Salmonella Choleraesuis and other Salmonella spp. from pigs.
    Osumi T, Asai T, Namimatsu T, Sato S, Yamamoto K.
    J Vet Med Sci; 2003 Aug; 65(8):949-51. PubMed ID: 12951433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of culture, ELISA and PCR techniques for salmonella detection in faecal samples for cattle, pig and poultry.
    Eriksson E, Aspan A.
    BMC Vet Res; 2007 Sep 22; 3():21. PubMed ID: 17888169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A comparison of EF-18 agar and modified brilliant green agar with lutensit for isolation of Salmonella from poultry samples.
    Petersen L.
    Acta Vet Scand; 1997 Sep 22; 38(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 9129349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Impact of invA-PCR and culture detection methods on occurrence and survival of salmonella in the flesh, internal organs and lymphoid tissues of experimentally infected pigs.
    Arnold T, Scholz HC, Marg H, Rösler U, Hensel A.
    J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2004 Dec 22; 51(10):459-63. PubMed ID: 15606871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The effect of fecal sample weight on detection of Salmonella enterica in swine feces.
    Funk JA, Davies PR, Nichols MA.
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 2000 Sep 22; 12(5):412-8. PubMed ID: 11021427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A comparison of the efficiency of Rappaport-Vassiliadis, tetrathionate and selenite broths with and without pre-enrichment for the isolation of Salmonella in animal waste biogas plants.
    Schlundt J, Munch B.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1993 Aug 22; 279(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 8219504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.