These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
169 related items for PubMed ID: 11108192
41. A comparative study of cultural methods for the detection of Salmonella in feed and feed ingredients. Koyuncu S, Haggblom P. BMC Vet Res; 2009 Feb 03; 5():6. PubMed ID: 19192298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Salmonellas in Danish pigs: a comparison of three isolation methods. Skovgaard N, Christensen SG, Gulistani AW. J Hyg (Lond); 1985 Aug 03; 95(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 3894510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The effect of preenrichment and selective enrichment media on recovery of Salmonella Typhi from the tropical fruit mamey. Hammack TS, Jacobson AP, Andrews WH. J AOAC Int; 2008 Aug 03; 91(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 18376589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of methods for recovery of Salmonella from dairy cattle, poultry, and swine farms. Pangloli P, Dje Y, Oliver SP, Mathew A, Golden DA, Taylor WJ, Draughon FA. J Food Prot; 2003 Nov 03; 66(11):1987-95. PubMed ID: 14627273 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison between a cultural procedure using Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth and motility enrichments on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for Salmonella detection from food and feed. Wiberg C, Norberg P. Int J Food Microbiol; 1996 Apr 03; 29(2-3):353-60. PubMed ID: 8796434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Toward standardization of diagnostic PCR testing of fecal samples: lessons from the detection of salmonellae in pigs. Malorny B, Hoorfar J. J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Jul 03; 43(7):3033-7. PubMed ID: 16000411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Detection of Salmonella serovars from clinical samples by enrichment broth cultivation-PCR procedure. Stone GG, Oberst RD, Hays MP, McVey S, Chengappa MM. J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Jul 03; 32(7):1742-9. PubMed ID: 7929768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Salmonella surveillance with reference to pigs--Cardiff abattoir, 1968-1975. Harvey RW, Price TH, Morgan J. J Hyg (Lond); 1977 Jun 03; 78(3):439-48. PubMed ID: 325128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of four different methods for Salmonella detection in fecal samples of porcine origin. Korsak N, Degeye JN, Etienne G, China B, Daube G. J Food Prot; 2004 Oct 03; 67(10):2158-64. PubMed ID: 15508624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Verification of different methods used for isolating Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin from cattle feces. Fujihara M, Hayashi M, Hara K, Sakazume N, Tsukuda T, Tagaino Y. J Vet Med Sci; 2023 Oct 19; 85(10):1077-1082. PubMed ID: 37673592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Comparative studies with Bierbrauer's tetrathionate broth and selenite broth in the demonstration of salmonella in fecal samples of cattle and in bacteriologic meat control]. Heidrich D. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr (1946); 1963 Nov 01; 70(21):595-601. PubMed ID: 5896696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. A modelling approach to estimate the sensitivity of pooled faecal samples for isolation of Salmonella in pigs. Arnold ME, Cook A, Davies R. J R Soc Interface; 2005 Sep 22; 2(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 16849194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]