These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

332 related items for PubMed ID: 11108371

  • 1. Effects of hearing impairment and presentation level on masking period patterns for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes.
    Summers V.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2307-17. PubMed ID: 11108371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Overshoot effects using Schroeder-phase harmonic maskers in listeners with normal hearing and with hearing impairment.
    Summers V.
    Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 162(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 11707346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V, Leek MR.
    Hear Res; 1998 Apr; 118(1-2):139-50. PubMed ID: 9606069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of basilar-membrane nonlinearity on the shapes of masking period patterns in normal and impaired hearing.
    Wojtczak M, Schroder AC, Kong YY, Nelson DA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1571-86. PubMed ID: 11325128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.
    Oxenham AJ, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights.
    Alexander JM, Lutfi RA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2234-47. PubMed ID: 15532655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Linearized response growth inferred from growth-of-masking slopes in ears with cochlear hearing loss.
    Nelson DA, Schroder AC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Apr; 101(4):2186-201. PubMed ID: 9104021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA, Fortune TW.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA, Schroder AC, Wojtczak M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE, Small SA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of masker component phase on the forward masking produced by complex tones in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Moore BC, Stainsby TH, Tarasewicz E.
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15157967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Excess masking among listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss.
    Gagné JP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jun; 83(6):2311-21. PubMed ID: 3411023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Alcántara JI, Moore BC.
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):103-16. PubMed ID: 12031520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The binaural masking level difference as a function of frequency, masker level and masking bandwidth in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hall JW, Harvey AD.
    Audiology; 1985 Mar; 24(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 3977781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Release from upward spread of masking in regions of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Nelson DA, Schroder AC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2266-77. PubMed ID: 8865635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M.
    Audiology; 1992 Oct; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Wojtczak M, Oxenham AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 20649220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Phase effects in masking related to dispersion in the inner ear. II. Masking period patterns of short targets.
    Kohlrausch A, Sander A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1817-29. PubMed ID: 7699163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.