These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

115 related items for PubMed ID: 11125191

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Reliability of Logicon caries detector in the detection and depth assessment of dental caries: an in-vitro study.
    Behere RR, Lele SM.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):362. PubMed ID: 21891917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS, Saini TS, Carroll LR.
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Digital radiology and image analysis for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Forner L, Llena MC, Almerich JM, García-Godoy F.
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):312-5. PubMed ID: 10823079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R, Wicht MJ, Nowak G, Hellmich M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
    Wenzel A, Borg E, Hintze H, Gröndahl HG.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinically undetected dental caries assessed by bitewing screening in children with little caries experience.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8181654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The efficacy of a computerized caries detector in intraoral digital radiography.
    Gakenheimer DC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Jul; 133(7):883-90. PubMed ID: 12148682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
    Matalon S, Feuerstein O, Kaffe I.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A, Anthonisen PN, Juul MB.
    Caries Res; 2000 May; 34(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 10867419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of computer assistance on observer performance of approximal caries diagnosis using intraoral digital radiography.
    Araki K, Matsuda Y, Seki K, Okano T.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Jun; 14(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19557443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Utility and effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis of dental caries.
    Tracy KD, Dykstra BA, Gakenheimer DC, Scheetz JP, Lacina S, Scarfe WC, Farman AG.
    Gen Dent; 2011 Jun; 59(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 21903524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.