These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
144 related items for PubMed ID: 11132433
1. [Sick sinus syndrome indication: AAI/R versus DDD/R]. Kainz W. Wien Med Wochenschr; 2000; 150(19-21):407-9. PubMed ID: 11132433 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing. Masumoto H, Ueda Y, Kato R, Usui A, Maseki T, Takagi Y, Usui M. Europace; 2004 Sep; 6(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 15294270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block. Gillis AM, Pürerfellner H, Israel CW, Sunthorn H, Kacet S, Anelli-Monti M, Tang F, Young M, Boriani G, Medtronic Enrhythm Clinical Study Investigators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Atrial pacing should be used more frequently in sinus node disease. Tripp IG, Armstrong GP, Stewart JT, Hood MA, Smith WM. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 28(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 15826261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation]. Stangl K, Wirtzfeld A, Alt E, Blömer H. Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Atrial vs. dual-chamber cardiac pacing in sinus node disease: a register-based cohort study. Fored CM, Granath F, Gadler F, Blomqvist P, Rynder J, Linde C, Ekbom A, Rosenqvist M. Europace; 2008 Jul; 10(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 18467299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Selecting the appropriate pacing mode for patients with sick sinus syndrome: evidence from randomized clinical trials. Albertsen AE, Nielsen JC. Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 15071265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Near elimination of ventricular pacing in SafeR mode compared to DDD modes: a randomized study of 422 patients. Davy JM, Hoffmann E, Frey A, Jocham K, Rossi S, Dupuis JM, Frabetti L, Ducloux P, Prades E, Jauvert G. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 35(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 22309303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The atrial pacemaker as therapy in sinus node disease: retrospective analysis of complications and rate of survival]. Lemke B, Hoeltmann BJ, Selbach H, Barmeyer J. Z Kardiol; 1987 Aug; 76(8):484-91. PubMed ID: 3673168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative effects of atrial and ventricular stimulation on morbidity and mortality in patients with sinus node disease]. Zanini R, Facchinetti AI, Gallo G, Cazzamalli L, Metra M, Benedini G. Cardiologia; 1990 Jun; 35(6):499-502. PubMed ID: 2078840 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sick sinus syndrome: strategies for reducing mortality. Cosín J, Hernandiz A, Solaz J, Andres F, Olagüe J. Cor Vasa; 1992 Jun; 34(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 1304454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicenter, prospective, randomized safety and efficacy study of a new atrial-based managed ventricular pacing mode (MVP) in dual chamber ICDs. Sweeney MO, Ellenbogen KA, Casavant D, Betzold R, Sheldon T, Tang F, Mueller M, Lingle J, Marquis MVP Download Investigators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Aug; 16(8):811-7. PubMed ID: 16101620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A new dual-chamber pacing mode to minimize ventricular pacing. Savouré A, Fröhlig G, Galley D, Defaye P, Reuter S, Mabo P, Sadoul N, Amblard A, Limousin M, Anselme F. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S43-6. PubMed ID: 15683522 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Feasibility and safety of long-term AAI(R) pacing in isolated sinus node syndrome]. Körber T, Voss W, Ismer B, Weber F, Nienaber CA, von Knorre GH. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2006 Mar; 17(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16547656 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Neuroendocrine and haemodynamic changes in single-lead atrial pacing and dual-chamber pacing modes. Zhang YY, Wu DY, Fu NK, Lu FM, Xu J. J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1057-66. PubMed ID: 23816931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term reliability of AAI mode pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction and low Wenckebach block rate. Adachi M, Igawa O, Yano A, Miake J, Inoue Y, Ogura K, Kato M, Iitsuka K, Hisatome I. Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 18199569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. DDD(R)-pacing, but not AAI(R)-pacing induces left ventricular desynchronization in patients with sick sinus syndrome: tissue-Doppler and 3D echocardiographic evaluation in a randomized controlled comparison. Albertsen AE, Nielsen JC, Poulsen SH, Mortensen PT, Pedersen AK, Hansen PS, Jensen HK, Egeblad H. Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 18192700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of atrial versus atrioventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome during long-term follow-up. Kuniewicz M, Rydlewska A, Karkowski G, Lelakowska-Pieła M, Majewski J, Lelakowski J. Kardiol Pol; 2015 Feb; 73(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 25001847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Adverse effects of first-degree AV-block in patients with sinus node dysfunction: data from the mode selection trial. Holmqvist F, Hellkamp AS, Lee KL, Lamas GA, Daubert JP, MOST investigators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Sep; 37(9):1111-9. PubMed ID: 24797760 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]