These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
824 related items for PubMed ID: 11136768
1. Contemporary assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin B and colistin: review of available interpretative criteria and quality control guidelines. Gales AC, Reis AO, Jones RN. J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 39(1):183-90. PubMed ID: 11136768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and broth microdilution for testing susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa to polymyxins. van der Heijden IM, Levin AS, De Pedri EH, Fung L, Rossi F, Duboc G, Barone AA, Costa SF. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2007 Aug 15; 6():8. PubMed ID: 17697363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in potency and categorical agreement between colistin and polymyxin B when testing 15,377 clinical strains collected worldwide. Sader HS, Rhomberg PR, Farrell DJ, Jones RN. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Dec 15; 83(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 26415906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin. Behera B, Mathur P, Das A, Kapil A, Gupta B, Bhoi S, Farooque K, Sharma V, Misra MC. Int J Infect Dis; 2010 Jul 15; 14(7):e596-601. PubMed ID: 20045367 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality control guidelines for testing gram-negative control strains with polymyxin B and colistin (polymyxin E) by standardized methods. Jones RN, Anderegg TR, Swenson JM, Quality Control Working Group. J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Feb 15; 43(2):925-7. PubMed ID: 15695708 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Sensitivity to colistin: evaluation of cut-off points available in disk diffusion test]. Rodríguez CH, Pautaso J, Bombicino K, Vay C, Famiglietti A. Rev Argent Microbiol; 2004 Feb 15; 36(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 15559194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Polymyxin B Etest® compared with gold-standard broth microdilution in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae exhibiting a wide range of polymyxin B MICs. Kulengowski B, Ribes JA, Burgess DS. Clin Microbiol Infect; 2019 Jan 15; 25(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 29674129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2, disk diffusion, etest, broth microdilution, and agar dilution susceptibility testing methods for colistin in clinical isolates, including heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii strains. Lo-Ten-Foe JR, de Smet AM, Diederen BM, Kluytmans JA, van Keulen PH. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Oct 15; 51(10):3726-30. PubMed ID: 17646414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of antibacterial activities of polymyxin B and colistin against multidrug resistant Gram negative bacteria. Doymaz MZ, Karaaslan E. Infect Dis (Lond); 2019 Sep 15; 51(9):676-682. PubMed ID: 31298061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Evaluation of Broth Microdilution with Polystyrene and Glass-Coated Plates, Agar Dilution, E-Test, Vitek, and Disk Diffusion for Susceptibility Testing of Colistin and Polymyxin B on Carbapenem-Resistant Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Singhal L, Sharma M, Verma S, Kaur R, Britto XB, Kumar SM, Ray P, Gautam V. Microb Drug Resist; 2018 Oct 15; 24(8):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 29406804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Calcium-Enhanced Media for Colistin Susceptibility Testing by Gradient Agar Diffusion and Broth Microdilution. Green DA, Macesic N, Uhlemann AC, Lopez M, Stump S, Whittier S, Schuetz AN, Simner PJ, Humphries RM. J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Jan 28; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 31748324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]