These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

271 related items for PubMed ID: 11161401

  • 1. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
    Monsonego J, Autillo-Touati A, Bergeron C, Dachez R, Liaras J, Saurel J, Zerat L, Chatelain P, Mottot C.
    Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb 02; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Liquid phase cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer: a multicenter study].
    Monsonégo J, Autillo-Touati A, Bergeron C, Dachez R, Liaras J, Saurel J, Zerat L, Chatelain P, Mottot C.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Nov 02; 29(11):799-807. PubMed ID: 11770273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma.
    Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, Herrero R, Alfaro M, Bratti MC, Hildesheim A, Lorincz AT, Greenberg MD, Morales J, Schiffman M.
    Cancer; 1999 Apr 25; 87(2):48-55. PubMed ID: 10227593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
    Wang TY, Chen HS, Yang YC, Tsou MC.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul 25; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
    Fremont-Smith M, Marino J, Griffin B, Spencer L, Bolick D.
    Cancer; 2004 Oct 25; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing.
    Sherman ME, Schiffman MH, Lorincz AT, Herrero R, Hutchinson ML, Bratti C, Zahniser D, Morales J, Hildesheim A, Helgesen K, Kelly D, Alfaro M, Mena F, Balmaceda I, Mango L, Greenberg M.
    Cancer; 1997 Apr 25; 81(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 9126136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology.
    Tezuka F, Oikawa H, Shuki H, Higashiiwai H.
    Acta Cytol; 1996 Apr 25; 40(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8669188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparative study of the ThinPrep Pap test and conventional cytology results in a Canadian cohort.
    Duggan MA, Khalil M, Brasher PM, Nation JG.
    Cytopathology; 2006 Apr 25; 17(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16548991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
    Carpenter AB, Davey DD.
    Cancer; 1999 Jun 25; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The PapSpin: a reasonable alternative to other, more expensive liquid-based Papanicolaou tests.
    Rosenthal DL, Geddes S, Trimble CL, Carson KA, Alli PM.
    Cancer; 2006 Jun 25; 108(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 16628656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
    Sigurdsson K.
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug 25; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy.
    Bernstein SJ, Sanchez-Ramos L, Ndubisi B.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug 25; 185(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 11518884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of cellular residue in the ThinPrep PreservCyt vial.
    Massarani-Wafai R, Bakhos R, Wojcik EM, Selvaggi SM.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Sep 25; 23(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 10945912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.