These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
252 related items for PubMed ID: 11168297
1. How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories? Jørgensen HL, Warming L, Bjarnason NH, Andersen PB, Hassager C. Clin Physiol; 2001 Jan; 21(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11168297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound. Drozdzowska B, Pluskiewicz W, Tarnawska B. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12424634 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry. El-Desouki MI, Sherafzal MS, Othman SA. Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status. Langton CM, Langton DK. Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):31-5. PubMed ID: 10721317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the four-year effects of hormone replacement therapy. Sahota O, San P, Cawte SA, Pearson D, Hosking DJ. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Jan; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10663359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Jan; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 1999 Jan; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, Lang P, Jergas M, Takada M, Glüer CC, Lu Y, Chavez M. J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination? Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 2000 May; 11(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 10912845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of an imaging heel quantitative ultrasound device (DTU-one) with densitometric and ultrasonic measurements. Diessel E, Fuerst T, Njeh CF, Hans D, Cheng S, Genant HK. Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):23-30. PubMed ID: 10721316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Feb; 16(2):406-16. PubMed ID: 11204441 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment? Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Perisinakis K, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Osteoporos Int; 2003 Aug; 14(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 12897977 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men. Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Gennari L, Montagnani A, Caffarelli C, Merlotti D, Rossi S, Cadirni A, Nuti R. Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 15599495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of accuracy and cost effectiveness of clinical criteria and BUA for referral for BMD assessment by DXA in osteoporotic and osteopenic perimenopausal subjects. Langton CM, Langton DK, Beardsworth SA. Technol Health Care; 1999 Aug; 7(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 10543417 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of quantitative heel ultrasound compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in determining bone mineral density in chronic haemodialysis patients. Taal MW, Cassidy MJ, Pearson D, Green D, Masud T. Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 Aug; 14(8):1917-21. PubMed ID: 10462271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry. He YQ, Fan B, Hans D, Li J, Wu CY, Njeh CF, Zhao S, Lu Y, Tsuda-Futami E, Fuerst T, Genant HK. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Aug; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination? Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 2001 Aug; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound technology and dual energy X-ray densitometry in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: influence of sex and menopausal status. Camozzi V, Lumachi F, Mantero F, Piccolo M, Luisetto G. Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jul; 14(7):602-8. PubMed ID: 12730752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Cetin A, Ertürk H, Celiker R, Sivri A, Hasçelik Z. Rheumatol Int; 2001 Feb; 20(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 11269533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women. Dubois EF, van den Bergh JP, Smals AG, van de Meerendonk CW, Zwinderman AH, Schweitzer DH. Neth J Med; 2001 Feb; 58(2):62-70. PubMed ID: 11166447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]