These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


818 related items for PubMed ID: 11174538

  • 1. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Pistorio A, Sfondrini G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C.
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bond strength comparison of moisture-insensitive primers.
    Schaneveldt S, Foley TF.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 12226607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J.
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets.
    Lippitz SJ, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):620-4. PubMed ID: 9637564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer.
    Grandhi RK, Combe EC, Speidel TM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 11244419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.
    Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Romeo A, de la Higuera B, García-Godoy F.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12607856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding agent.
    Ali H, Maroli S.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep 01; 13(5):650-4. PubMed ID: 23250169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O, el Alam R, Chagneau F, Cathelineau G.
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr 01; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY, Woods MG, Tyas MJ.
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr 01; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK, Ulusoy C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb 01; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD, Bailey DK, Thompson JY, Pietz DM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan 01; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems.
    Bishara SE, Gordan VV, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan 01; 115(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9878954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of fluoride release by resin-modified GIC and polyacid-modified composite resin.
    Rix D, Foley TF, Banting D, Mamandras A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct 01; 120(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 11606965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB, Cárdenas M.
    World J Orthod; 2006 Oct 01; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of fluoride release protocols for in-vitro testing of 3 orthodontic adhesives.
    Wheeler AW, Foley TF, Mamandras A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Mar 01; 121(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 11941345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 41.