These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

195 related items for PubMed ID: 11176258

  • 21. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of iomeprol, iohexol and iopamidol in intravenous urography.
    Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A.
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):712-5. PubMed ID: 7640924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Pharmacokinetics and safety of iomeprol in healthy volunteers and in patients with renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis.
    Lorusso V, Taroni P, Alvino S, Spinazzi A.
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Jun; 36(6):309-16. PubMed ID: 11410750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Diffusion of contrast media in cerebrospinal fluid: comparison of iohexol, iopamidol and iotrolan in vitro.
    Raininko R, Teräväinen H.
    Neuroradiology; 1992 Jun; 34(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 1630618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The difference of contrast effects of myelography in normal dogs: comparison of iohexol (180 mgI/ml), iohexol (240 mgI/ml) and iotrolan (240 mgI/ml).
    Shimizu J, Yamada K, Kishimoto M, Iwasaki T, Miyake Y.
    J Vet Med Sci; 2008 Jul; 70(7):659-63. PubMed ID: 18685236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Iomeprol versus iopromide for intravenous urography.
    de Geeter P, Melchior H.
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):958-63. PubMed ID: 8000839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Iotrolan versus iopamidol. A controlled double-blind study with lumbar myelography].
    Maier B, Gerber U, König M, Stetter G.
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):393-6. PubMed ID: 1410326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Animal experimental myelography in the pig. A comparison between iohexol and iotrolan.
    Skalpe IO, Tang GJ.
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Apr; 30(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 7635674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The ACTIVE Trial: comparison of the effects on renal function of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing abdominal computed tomography.
    Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Erley CM, Grazioli L, Bonomo L, Ni Z, Romano L, Investigators in the Abdominal Computed Tomography: IOMERON 400 Versus VISIPAQUE 320 Enhancement (ACTIVE) Study.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Mar; 43(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 18301313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Nonionic contrast media iohexol and iomeprol decrease renal arterial tone: comparative studies on human and porcine isolated vascular segments.
    Uder M, Humke U, Pahl M, Jansen A, Utz J, Kramann B.
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Aug; 37(8):440-7. PubMed ID: 12138360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Brain penetration of intrathecal iomeprol in dogs.
    La Noce A, Lorenzon P, Pugliese F, Pellecchi G, Orlandini I, Tirone P.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Jul; 37(4):578-81. PubMed ID: 8688246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Iohexol: a new nonionic contrast medium for myelography and cisternography with markedly reduced neurotoxicity.
    Gonsette RE, Liesenborghs L.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Jul; 20(1 Suppl):S32-6. PubMed ID: 3871751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Hypersensitivity Reactions Induced by Iodinated Contrast Media in Radiological Diagnosis: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS Database.
    Long J, Yi Y, Zhang Y, Li X.
    Curr Med Imaging; 2024 Jul; 20():e15734056306358. PubMed ID: 39051585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Pharmacodynamic effects of iomeprol for injection in experimental animals.
    Cipolla P, Tirone P, Luzzani F, de Haën C.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S32-42. PubMed ID: 8020517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Cytotoxic effects of ionic high-osmolar, nonionic monomeric, and nonionic iso-osmolar dimeric iodinated contrast media on renal tubular cells in vitro.
    Heinrich MC, Kuhlmann MK, Grgic A, Heckmann M, Kramann B, Uder M.
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):843-9. PubMed ID: 15845795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Acute Adverse Reactions to Nonionic Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis.
    Suh YJ, Yoon SH, Hong H, Hahn S, Kang DY, Kang HR, Choi YH, Lee W.
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Sep; 54(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 30998567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Neural tolerance of the non-ionic dimers iodixanol and iotrolan and the non-ionic monomer iopamidol during myelography in non-anaesthetised rabbits.
    Maly P, Sundgren P, Bååth L, Walday P.
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Nov; 36(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 8519577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Outpatient myelography with iohexol and iopamidol; pilot study and contrast trial.
    Waugh JR, Sacharias N.
    Australas Radiol; 1989 Feb; 33(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 2653297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Double-blind comparison of safety and efficacy of iomeprol and iopamidol in carotid digital subtraction angiography.
    Beltramello A, Piovan E, Rosta L.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S67-72. PubMed ID: 8020521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A comparison of iohexol and iopamidol for lumbar myelography.
    Hoe JW, Ng AM, Tan LK.
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Sep; 37(5):505-7. PubMed ID: 3530602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Comments on the article by B. Maier et al. Iotrolan versus Iopamidol. A controlled double-blind study in lumbar myelography].
    Maier B.
    Radiologe; 1993 Jan; 33(1):59. PubMed ID: 8441809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.