These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

300 related items for PubMed ID: 11190023

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
    Fan X, Wu LL, Ma ZZ, Xiao GG, Liu F.
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jul; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Jul; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y, Tajimi Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
    Nomoto H, Matsumoto C, Takada S, Hashimoto S, Arimura E, Okuyama S, Shimomura Y.
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA, Hutchison DM, McCormick TA, Varma DK, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects.
    Mastropasqua L, Brusini P, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Di Antonio L, Zeppieri MW, Parisi L.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK, Wakili N, Jünemann AM, Korth M.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M, Neahring RK, Woodward KR.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Repeatability of frequency doubling technology perimetry (20-1 screening program) and the effect of pupillary dilatation on interpretation.
    Parikh R, Muliyil J, George R, Bhat S, Thomas R.
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 15(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18300088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.