These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
134 related items for PubMed ID: 1119201
1. [Some indices of speech audiometry in various disorders of the peripheral stages of the auditory analyzer]. Shidlovskaia TV. Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1975; (1):8-12. PubMed ID: 1119201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Use of various electrophysiologic methods of objective audiometry for evaluation of the functional state of the peripheral division of the auditory analyzer under clinical and experimental conditions (a review of the current literature)]. Bakaĭ EA, Kolesnik TE. Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1971; 31(6):106-9. PubMed ID: 4949972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment by audiotympanometric testing: three case reports. Neff PA, Cantrell RW. Laryngoscope; 1977 Jul; 87(7):1052-65. PubMed ID: 875566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical application of special hearing tests. Johnson EW. Arch Otolaryngol; 1973 Jan; 97(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 4684914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic value of testing of hearing by the method of speech masking]. Diskalenko VV. Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1979 Jan; (5):7-10. PubMed ID: 505768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Immitance audiometry. Sutherland JE, Campbell K. Prim Care; 1990 Jun; 17(2):233-47. PubMed ID: 2196607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Sound-conduction-plastic or electro-acoustic hearing aid? Indications and selection of measures to improve hearing]. Schulthess G, von. Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1970 Jun 27; 100(26):1093-101. PubMed ID: 5515770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Probe-tone frequency and the diagnostic value of tympanometry. Alberti PW, Jerger JF. Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Mar 27; 99(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 4853778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The Lewis-Federici test in the diagnosis of stapedial ankylosis]. Pietruski J. Otolaryngol Pol; 1972 Mar 27; 26(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 4564102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of the nature of acoustic relief on the magnitude of the duration effect in patients with peripheral hearing lesions]. Rozenblium AS. Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1970 Mar 27; 32(6):72-4. PubMed ID: 5496855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impedance audiometry as a screening procedure for middle ear disease. McCandless GA, Thomas GK. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1974 Mar 27; 78(2):ORL98-102. PubMed ID: 4825072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Interrelationship between the perception of "live" speech and the data from tonal and speech audiometry in chronic suppurative otitis and coclear neuritis patients]. Kolomiĭchenko AI, Shidlovskaia TV. Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1974 Mar 27; 0(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 4605755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging of middle ear pathology. Veillon F, Riehm S, Roedlich MN, Meriot P, Blonde E, Tongio J. Semin Roentgenol; 2000 Jan 27; 35(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 10670048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Differential diagnosis of conductive deafness using impedance pressure and threshold changes]. Opitz HJ, Schlöndorff G, Tegtmeier W. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Mar 27; 52(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 4698072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]