These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS). Pedrazzoni M, Girasole G, Bertoldo F, Bianchi G, Cepollaro C, Del Puente A, Giannini S, Gonnelli S, Maggio D, Marcocci C, Minisola S, Palummeri E, Rossini M, Sartori L, Sinigaglia L. Osteoporos Int; 2003 Dec; 14(12):978-82. PubMed ID: 14530829 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Women in Buenos Aires Based on Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine and Femur. Mautalen C, Schianchi A, Sigal D, Gianetti G, Vidan V, Bagur A, González D, Mastaglia S, Oliveri B. J Clin Densitom; 2016 Oct; 19(4):471-476. PubMed ID: 26948141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006 Oct; 6(20):1-180. PubMed ID: 23074491 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of bone mineral density in lumbar spine and femoral neck in a Spanish population. Multicentre Research Project on Osteoporosis. Diaz Curiel M, Carrasco de la Peña JL, Honorato Perez J, Perez Cano R, Rapado A, Ruiz Martinez I. Osteoporos Int; 1997 Oct; 7(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 9102065 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence of low central bone mineral density in a Bulgarian female referral population: a pilot study. Boyanov MA. Rheumatol Int; 2006 Apr; 26(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 16082556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women. Fiter J, Nolla JM, Gómez-Vaquero C, Martínez-Aguilá D, Valverde J, Roig-Escofet D. Osteoporos Int; 2001 Apr; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry. El-Desouki MI, Sherafzal MS, Othman SA. Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of women with reduced bone density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using BMD at the os calcis. Fordham JN, Chinn DJ, Kumar N. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Sep; 11(9):797-802. PubMed ID: 11148807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: do the accepted normal ranges lead to overdiagnosis? Ahmed AI, Blake GM, Rymer JM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 1997 Sep; 7(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 9425500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence of osteoporosis in Thai men. Pongchaiyakul C, Apinyanurag C, Soontrapa S, Soontrapa S, Pongchaiyakul C, Nguyen TV, Rajatanavin R. J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Feb; 89(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 16579001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Association between fat mass, lean mass, and bone loss: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Yang S, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Osteoporos Int; 2015 Apr; 26(4):1381-6. PubMed ID: 25572048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss. Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA. J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]