These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

182 related items for PubMed ID: 11199434

  • 1. [Full-field digital mammography: dose-dependent detectability of breast lesions and microcalcinosis].
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Schorn C, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1052-6. PubMed ID: 11199434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Full-field digital mammography: a phantom study for detection of microcalcification].
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Schorn C, Funke M, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2000 Jul; 172(7):646-50. PubMed ID: 10962993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study.
    Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E.
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):478-82. PubMed ID: 12857708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.
    Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Funke M, Grabbe EH.
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2188-91. PubMed ID: 12195468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
    Peters S, Hellmich M, Stork A, Kemper J, Grinstein O, Püsken M, Stahlhut L, Kinner S, Maintz D, Krug KB.
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography: image contrast and lesion characterization.
    Yamada T, Ishibashi T, Sato A, Saito M, Saito H, Matsuhashi T, Takahashi S.
    Radiat Med; 2003 Apr; 21(4):166-71. PubMed ID: 14514123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
    Diekmann S, Bick U, von Heyden H, Diekmann F.
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y, Hatemura M, Yoshida A, Takada T, Takahashi M.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography.
    Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E.
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Nov; 12(11):2679-83. PubMed ID: 12386757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
    Liu X, Lai CJ, Whitman GJ, Geiser WR, Shen Y, Yi Y, Shaw CC.
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The impact on lesion detection via a multi-vendor study: A phantom-based comparison of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and synthetic mammography.
    Vancoillie L, Cockmartin L, Marshall N, Bosmans H.
    Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6270-6292. PubMed ID: 34407213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
    Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Johnston DA, Lemacks MR, Liu X, Whitman GJ, Dryden MJ, Stephens TW, Thompson SK, Krugh KT, Lai CJ.
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.