These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

319 related items for PubMed ID: 11201959

  • 21. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):555-68. PubMed ID: 15520688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The use of the lingual arch in the mixed dentition to resolve incisor crowding.
    Brennan MM, Gianelly AA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 10629524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal Class I individuals presenting with different dental angle classifications.
    Akyalçin S, Doğan S, Dinçer B, Erdinc AM, Oncağ G.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):637-43. PubMed ID: 16808571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
    Cattaneo PM, Treccani M, Carlsson K, Thorgeirsson T, Myrda A, Cevidanes LH, Melsen B.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Effectiveness of a lower lingual arch as a space holding device.
    Owais AI, Rousan ME, Badran SA, Abu Alhaija ES.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 20660503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z, Arslan AD.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H.
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002 May; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Mandibular intercanine width increase without intervention in children with slipped contacts.
    Hartmann CR, Hanson PR, Pincsak JJ.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001 May; 23(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 11800445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C, Sahinoğlu Z, Özçirpici AA, Uçkan S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The uprighting effect of the Fränkel appliance on the mandibular canines and premolars during eruption.
    Fränkel R, Müller M, Falck F.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Aug; 92(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 3475965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Tooth movement after orthodontic treatment with 4 second premolar extractions.
    Chen K, Han X, Huang L, Bai D.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):770-7. PubMed ID: 21130336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Dental arch dimensions and tooth wear in two samples of children in the 1950s and 1990s.
    Camporesi M, Marinelli A, Baroni G, Defraia E.
    Br Dent J; 2009 Dec 19; 207(12):E24. PubMed ID: 19876044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion.
    Chong YH, Ive JC, Artun J.
    Angle Orthod; 1996 Dec 19; 66(5):351-62. PubMed ID: 8893105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.
    Wiedel AP.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015 Dec 19; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Dentoskeletal effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Twin Block appliance in a Brazilian sample: a prospective study.
    Saikoski LZ, Cançado RH, Valarelli FP, de Freitas KM.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014 Dec 19; 19(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 24713558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K, Woods MG.
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov 19; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.