These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

281 related items for PubMed ID: 11202031

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
    Calzavara TS, Carter CM, Axten C.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O, Grinshpun SA, Fauvel S, Basso G.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Beryllium aerosol characteristics in the magnesium and aluminum transformation industry in Quebec: a comparison of four different sampling methodologies.
    Dufresne A, Dion C, Viau S, Cloutier Y, Perrault G.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Nov; 6(11):687-97. PubMed ID: 19757293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Field comparison of 37-mm closed-face cassettes and IOM samplers.
    Demange M, Görner P, Elcabache JM, Wrobel R.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Mar; 17(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 11871756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Field comparison of inhalable and total dust samplers for assessing airborne dust in swine confinement barns.
    Predicala BZ, Maghirang RG.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Sep; 18(9):694-701. PubMed ID: 12909537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Longitudinal evaluation of dose-response relationships for environmental exposures and pulmonary function in swine production workers.
    Reynolds SJ, Donham KJ, Whitten P, Merchant JA, Burmeister LF, Popendorf WJ.
    Am J Ind Med; 1996 Jan; 29(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 8808040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of production systems on swine confinement buildings bioaerosols.
    Létourneau V, Nehmé B, Mériaux A, Massé D, Duchaine C.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Feb; 7(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 19953413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Occupational exposure of poultry stockmen in current barn systems for egg production in the United Kingdom.
    Whyte RT.
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 12195795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.