These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Ermiş RB. Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up. Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG. J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations. Brackett MG, Dib A, Brackett WW, Estrada BE, Reyes AA. Oper Dent; 2002 Mar; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF. J Adhes Dent; 2003 Mar; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Gregory PN, Owens BM. Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. van Dijken JW. Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of different adhesive systems for restoring teeth with erosion lesions. Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G, Urlinger T. Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):58-66. PubMed ID: 15490777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]