These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

308 related items for PubMed ID: 11203830

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS, Schlueter M, Roach T, Moss ME.
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.
    de Freitas CR, Miranda MI, de Andrade MF, Flores VH, Vaz LG, Guimarães C.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Roebuck EM, Saunders WP, Whitters CJ.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 11764116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Ebert J, Lohbauer U, Käppel S, ten Weges S, Petschelt A.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Lamorgese V, Somma F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Retention of Class 3 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel bonding.
    Summitt JB, Chan DC, Dutton FB.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Mar; 18(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 8415168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P, Mahallati R, Bazos P, So WS.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008 Mar; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
    Demarco FF, Fay RM, Pinzon LM, Powers JM.
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.