These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


308 related items for PubMed ID: 11203830

  • 21. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
    Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV.
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ, Shaglouf AG, Combe EC, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Sep; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Swift EJ, Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y, Ma X, Fan M, Zhu S.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. An in-vitro microtensile test of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose adhesive applied at different priming times.
    Purk JH, Ganne S, Parikh R, Dusevich V, Glaros A, Eick JD.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Jan; 29(6):693-7. PubMed ID: 15646226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM, Ducatti CH, Garcia-Godoy F, De Goes MF.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000 Jan; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV, Wilson NH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Fracture toughness of pin-retained class 4 restorations.
    Attin T, Hellwig E, Hilgers RD, Zimmermann U.
    Oper Dent; 1994 May; 19(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9028250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Influence of ZOE temporary restorations on microleakage in composite restorations.
    Yap AU, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC.
    Oper Dent; 2002 May; 27(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 11933904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.