These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

389 related items for PubMed ID: 11203987

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Smales RJ, Wei SH.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):403-6. PubMed ID: 12691278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Dec; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Uçok M.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Dec; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May 01; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report.
    de Souza FB, Guimarães RP, Silva CH.
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan 01; 36(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15709496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical performance and wear resistance of two compomers in posterior occlusal restorations of permanent teeth: six-year follow-up.
    Lund RG, Sehn FP, Piva E, Detoni D, Moura FR, Cardoso PE, Demarco FF.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Jan 01; 32(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17427819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations.
    Wucher M, Grobler SR, Senekal PJ.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug 01; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun 01; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S, van Noort R.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb 01; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation.
    Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, De Stefano Dorigo E.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 01; 25(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 11203846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun 01; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A, Alpaslan T, Gurgan S.
    Oper Dent; 2009 Jun 01; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun 01; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results.
    Demirci M, Yildiz E, Uysal O.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Jun 01; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18335727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Mönting JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun 01; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite under different conditioning methods in primary teeth.
    Turgut MD, Tekçiçek M, Olmez S.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Jun 01; 29(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 15470873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Dent; 2006 Jul 01; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M, Friedrichs C.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Jul 01; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
    Bottenberg P, Alaerts M, Keulemans F.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb 01; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.