These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

389 related items for PubMed ID: 11203987

  • 21. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May 01; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Five-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities.
    Demirci M, Sancakli HS.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb 01; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16555657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb 01; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH, Klein-Júnior CA, Camargo JC, Beskow T, Balestrin MD, Demarco FF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar 01; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
    van Dijken JW.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct 01; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA, Rasmusson CG.
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct 01; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun 01; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract).
    Tyas MJ.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun 01; 25(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 11203809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb 01; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
    Türkün LS, Aktener BO, Ateş M.
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun 01; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in Class I cavities: 3-year results.
    Demirci M, Uysal O.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec 01; 19(6):376-81. PubMed ID: 17212081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Two-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities.
    Demirci M, Uçok M.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Oct 01; 15(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 12537341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in class V carious lesions: 3-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Topçubaşi M, Uçok M.
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep 01; 24(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 16279721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results.
    Roeters JJ, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk RC, Peters TC.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun 01; 11(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 9823078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Noncarious cervical lesions restored with three different tooth-colored materials: two-year results.
    Stojanac IL, Premovic MT, Ramic BD, Drobac MR, Stojsin IM, Petrovic LM.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Jun 01; 38(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 22856681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar 01; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin.
    Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC.
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb 01; 22(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2068249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer).
    Tyas MJ.
    Oper Dent; 1998 Feb 01; 23(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 9573792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Using a new condensable composite for posterior restorations.
    Poss SD.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999 Feb 01; (23):S14-8. PubMed ID: 12089754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.