These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

389 related items for PubMed ID: 11203987

  • 41. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
    Arhun N, Celik C, Yamanel K.
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study.
    Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K.
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite Class II restorations.
    Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I, Davidson C.
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):500-9. PubMed ID: 12216570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. 3-Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations.
    Loguercio AD, Reis A, Hernandez PA, Macedo RP, Busato AL.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16457675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
    Cehreli ZC, Cetinguc A, Cengiz SB, Altay AN.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN, Ritter AV.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001 Oct; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive.
    Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 15724760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12744410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. A randomized, controlled clinical trial of one-step self-etching adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Zhou Z, Yu S, Jiang Y, Lin Y, Xiong Y, Ni L.
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 19824561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Clinical performance of Class II adhesive restorations in pulpectomized primary molars: 12-month results.
    Zulfikaroglu BT, Atac AS, Cehreli ZC.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008 Aug; 75(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 18505646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb 15; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
    Gordan VV, Shen C, Watson RE, Mjor IA.
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb 15; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Evaluation of the mechanical and physical properties of a posterior resin composite in posterior adult teeth.
    Agbaje LO, Shaba OP, Adegbulugbe IC.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2010 Dec 15; 13(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 21220860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar 15; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
    Türkün LS, Türkün M, Ozata F.
    Quintessence Int; 2005 May 15; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 May 15; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite.
    Perry R, Kugel G, Leinfelder K.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Jun 15; 20(6):544-50, 552-3. PubMed ID: 10650367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in class I cavities: 5-year results.
    Demircia M.
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Dec 15; 9(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 18265712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.