These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
170 related items for PubMed ID: 11206166
1. Recognition of time-distorted sentences by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners. Fu QJ, Galvin JJ, Wang X. J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):379-84. PubMed ID: 11206166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users. Fu QJ, Galvin JJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1166-72. PubMed ID: 11303930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Time-compression thresholds for Mandarin sentences in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners. Meng Q, Wang X, Cai Y, Kong F, Buck AN, Yu G, Zheng N, Schnupp JWH. Hear Res; 2019 Mar 15; 374():58-68. PubMed ID: 30732921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. Fu QJ, Nogaki G. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar 15; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. Nelson PB, Jin SH. J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May 15; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners. Henry BA, Turner CW. J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 May 15; 113(5):2861-73. PubMed ID: 12765402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution. Loizou PC, Dorman M, Poroy O, Spahr T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov 15; 108(5 Pt 1):2377-87. PubMed ID: 11108378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners. Loizou PC, Poroy O. J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep 15; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects. Benoit C, Carlson RJ, King MC, Horn DL, Rubinstein JT. Hear Res; 2023 Nov 15; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners. Ji C, Galvin JJ, Xu A, Fu QJ. Ear Hear; 2013 Nov 15; 34(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 23238527 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study. Macherey O, Delpierre A. Ear Hear; 2013 Nov 15; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]