These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

434 related items for PubMed ID: 11206757

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM, Zhou JY, Hu SS, Cui JW, Song YH, Tang Y, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Yuan WM, Song XY.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul 29; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mitral valve compensation for annular dilatation: in vitro study into the mechanisms of functional mitral regurgitation with an adjustable annulus model.
    He S, Lemmon JD, Weston MW, Jensen MO, Levine RA, Yoganathan AP.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 May 29; 8(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 10399664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Bottio T.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May 29; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The pulmonary bioprosthetic heart valve: its unsuitability for use as an aortic valve replacement.
    Jennings LM, Butterfield M, Booth C, Watterson KG, Fisher J.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep 29; 11(5):668-78; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 12358404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of valve resistance, the continuity equation, and the Gorlin formula against directly observed orifice area in bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position: an in vitro study.
    Chambers JB, Wang Z, Cooke RA, Black MM.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar 29; 5(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 8665004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F, Dzemali O, Steinseiffer U, Schmitz C, Glasmacher B, Moritz A, Kleine P.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov 29; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Porcine aortic wall flexibility. Fresh vs Denacol fixed vs glutaraldehyde fixed.
    Zhou J, Quintero LJ, Helmus MN, Lee C, Kafesjian R.
    ASAIO J; 1997 Nov 29; 43(5):M470-5. PubMed ID: 9360087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. In vitro assessment of prosthetic valve function in mitral valve replacement with chordal preservation techniques.
    Fontaine AA, He S, Stadter R, Ellis JT, Levine RA, Yoganathan AP.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar 29; 5(2):186-98. PubMed ID: 8665014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.