These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

434 related items for PubMed ID: 11206757

  • 21. Comparison of the cross-linking characteristics of porcine heart valves fixed with glutaraldehyde or epoxy compounds.
    Sung HW, Shen SH, Tu R, Lin D, Hata C, Noishiki Y, Tomizawa Y, Quijano RC.
    ASAIO J; 1993; 39(3):M532-6. PubMed ID: 8268592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Analysis of the Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve. Effects of "zero-pressure" fixation.
    Vesely I.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Jan; 101(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 1986174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effects of annular size, transmitral pressure, and mitral flow rate on the edge-to-edge repair: an in vitro study.
    Jimenez JH, Forbess J, Croft LR, Small L, He Z, Yoganathan AP.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Oct; 82(4):1362-8. PubMed ID: 16996934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Biaxial strain distributions in explanted porcine bioprosthetic valves.
    Adamczyk MM, Vesely I.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 12358406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M, Kulik A, Rubens FD, Bédard P, Masters RG, Pipe AL, Mesana TG.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ, Eichinger WB, Hettich IM, Bleiziffer S, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. New insights in minimally invasive valve replacement: description of a cooperative approach for the off-pump replacement of mitral valves.
    Boudjemline Y, Pineau E, Borenstein N, Behr L, Bonhoeffer P.
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Oct; 26(19):2013-7. PubMed ID: 15872031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Trilogy pericardial valve: hemodynamic performance and calcification in adolescent sheep.
    Flameng W, Meuris B, De Visscher G, Cunanan C, Lane E, Verbeken E, Herijgers P, Herregods MC.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Feb; 85(2):587-92. PubMed ID: 18222270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Hydrodynamic performance of the Medtronic Freestyle Aortic Root Bioprosthesis.
    Yoganathan AP, Eberhardt CE, Walker PG.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Sep; 3(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 8000594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Velocity of closure of Björk-Shiley Convexo-Concave mitral valves: effect of mitral annulus orientation and rate of left ventricular pressure rise.
    Blick EF, Wieting DW, Inderbitzen R, Schreck S, Stein PD.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4 Suppl 1():S26-30; discussion S30-1. PubMed ID: 8581208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Design and performance characteristics of the Pericarbon Stentless valve.
    Stacchino C, Bona G, Rinaldi S, Vallana F.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4 Suppl 1():S102-5. PubMed ID: 8581203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS, Goldman B, Verrier E, Petracek M, Wood J, Goldman S, David T, Toronto SPV Valve Study Group.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12000166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Hydrodynamic characteristics of porcine aortic valves cross-linked with glutaraldehyde and polyepoxy compounds.
    Soda A, Tanaka R, Saida Y, Takashima K, Hirayama T, Umezu M, Yamane Y.
    ASAIO J; 2009 Mar; 55(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 19092670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Non-linear fluid-coupled computational model of the mitral valve.
    Einstein DR, Kunzelman KS, Reinhall PG, Nicosia MA, Cochran RP.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 May; 14(3):376-85. PubMed ID: 15974533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Hemodynamic performance of the Ultracor and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses using exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography.
    Hobson NA, Wilkinson GA, Wheeldon NM, Lynch J.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):828-34. PubMed ID: 16359066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Opening and closing kinematics of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F, Dzemali O, Steinseiffer U, Schmitz C, Glasmacher B, Moritz A, Kleine P.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 134(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 17723814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.