These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


112 related items for PubMed ID: 1121378

  • 21. A new data analyzing tocodynamometer and its suitability for clinical application.
    Furuya H, Hashimoto T, Fukamauchi K, Yoshida K.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Oct; 37(10):2121-9. PubMed ID: 4078411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Fetal electrocardiography and registration of intrauterine pressure during labor].
    de Haan J, Stolte LA, Eskes TK, van der Weide H, van Bemmel JH, Braaksma JT.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1970 Sep 05; 114(36):1493-501. PubMed ID: 5506746
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The prediction of "controlled" uterine rupture by the use of intrauterine pressure catheters.
    Devoe LD, Croom CS, Youssef AA, Murray C.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct 05; 80(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 1407884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Evaluating a new intrauterine pressure catheter.
    Dowdle M.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Aug 05; 42(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 9284013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
    Chia YT, Arulkumaran S, Yang M.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Jul 05; 42(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 8103477
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Intrapartum uterine activity: evaluation of an intrauterine pressure transducer.
    Goodlin RC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug 05; 74(2):283-4. PubMed ID: 2635882
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Technique of simultaneous direct intrauterine pressure recording for electronic monitoring of twin gestation in labor.
    Read JA, Miller FC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep 15; 129(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 900187
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Antepartum uterine activity characteristics differentiating true from threatened preterm labor.
    Newman RB, Richmond GS, Winston YE, Hamer C, Katz M.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jul 15; 76(1 Suppl):39S-41S. PubMed ID: 2359577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.