These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

595 related items for PubMed ID: 11230415

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/ALERT FN and the standard anaerobic SN blood culture medium.
    Mirrett S, Petti CA, Woods CW, Magadia R, Weinstein MP, Reller LB.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4581-5. PubMed ID: 15472312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood.
    Vetter E, Torgerson C, Feuker A, Hughes J, Harmsen S, Schleck C, Horstmeier C, Roberts G, Cockerill F.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Controlled comparison of original vented aerobic fan medium with new nonvented BacT/ALERT FA medium for culturing blood.
    Mirrett S, Everts RJ, Reller LB.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):2098-101. PubMed ID: 11376041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood.
    Mirrett S, Reller LB, Petti CA, Woods CW, Vazirani B, Sivadas R, Weinstein MP.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jun; 41(6):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12791854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Recovery and time to growth of isolates in blood culture bottles: comparison of BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F and BD Bactec Plus Anaerobic/F bottles.
    Passerini R, Cassatella MC, Salvatici M, Bottari F, Mauro C, Radice D, Sandri MT.
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2014 Apr; 46(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 24460080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of overnight storage of blood culture bottles on bacterial detection time in the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system.
    Janapatla RP, Yan JJ, Chien ML, Chen HM, Wu HM, Wu JJ.
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2010 Apr; 43(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 20457429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections.
    Ziegler R, Johnscher I, Martus P, Lenhardt D, Just HM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):657-61. PubMed ID: 9508291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia.
    Weinstein MP, Mirrett S, Reimer LG, Wilson ML, Smith-Elekes S, Chuard CR, Joho KL, Reller LB.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Apr; 33(4):978-81. PubMed ID: 7790471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.