These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

236 related items for PubMed ID: 11237369

  • 21. Weights and measures: a new look at bisection behaviour in neglect.
    McIntosh RD, Schindler I, Birchall D, Milner AD.
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):833-50. PubMed ID: 16275042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Failure to paint the left quarter of a watercolor and no error in a line drawing: a case report of an art teacher with unilateral spatial neglect.
    Kondo M, Mori T, Makino K, Okazaki T, Hachisuka K.
    Neurocase; 2012 Jun; 18(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 21936640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Rightward bisection errors for letter lines: the role of semantic information.
    Mohr C, Leonards U.
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan 28; 45(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 16945395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Rotation or translation of auditory space in neglect? A case study of chronic right-sided neglect.
    Kerkhoff G, Schindler I, Artinger F, Zoelch C, Bublak P, Finke K.
    Neuropsychologia; 2006 Jan 28; 44(6):923-30. PubMed ID: 16256151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Approaches to subjective midpoint of horizontal lines in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S, Koyama Y, Seki K, Hayashi K, Izumi Y.
    Cortex; 2006 Jul 28; 42(5):685-91. PubMed ID: 16909627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Reflecting upon line bisection: mirror reversal increases the magnitude of pseudoneglect.
    Brodie EE.
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Apr 28; 48(5):1517-20. PubMed ID: 20060402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Positive correlation in the bisection of long and short horizontal Oppel-Kundt illusory gradients: Implications for the interpretation of the "cross-over" effect in spatial neglect.
    Binetti N, Aiello M, Merola S, Bruschini M, Lecce F, Macci E, Doricchi F.
    Cortex; 2011 May 28; 47(5):608-16. PubMed ID: 20926070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines.
    Loftus AM, Nicholls ME, Mattingley JB, Chapman HL, Bradshaw JL.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May 28; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Classification images of two right hemisphere patients: a window into the attentional mechanisms of spatial neglect.
    Shimozaki S, Kingstone A, Olk B, Stowe R, Eckstein M.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 29; 1080(1):26-52. PubMed ID: 16497281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Things that go bump in the right: the effect of unimanual activity on rightward collisions.
    Nicholls ME, Loftus A, Mayer K, Mattingley JB.
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar 14; 45(5):1122-6. PubMed ID: 16999981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Perceptual and response bias in unilateral neglect: two modified versions of the milner landmark task.
    Bisiach E, Ricci R, Lualdi M, Colombo MR.
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Aug 14; 37(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 9733555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Left minineglect or inverse pseudoneglect in children with dyslexia?
    Michel C, Bidot S, Bonnetblanc F, Quercia P.
    Neuroreport; 2011 Jan 26; 22(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 21164370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Setting the midpoint of sentences: The role of the left hemisphere.
    Veronelli L, Arduino LS, Biscaro V, Corbo M, Vallar G.
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb 03; 137():107287. PubMed ID: 31863803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S, Furukawa T, Tsukagoshi H.
    Brain; 1989 Dec 03; 112 ( Pt 6)():1485-502. PubMed ID: 2597992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Spatial working memory capacity in unilateral neglect.
    Malhotra P, Jäger HR, Parton A, Greenwood R, Playford ED, Brown MM, Driver J, Husain M.
    Brain; 2005 Feb 03; 128(Pt 2):424-35. PubMed ID: 15644422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Line quadrisection errors in patients with hemispatial neglect.
    Lee BH, Kwon SU, Kwon JC, Baek MJ, Lee KH, Kim GH, Heilman KM, Na DL.
    Neurocase; 2011 Aug 03; 17(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 21294045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Dissociation of neglect subtypes with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Ghacibeh GA, Shenker JI, Winter KH, Triggs WJ, Heilman KM.
    Neurology; 2007 Sep 11; 69(11):1122-7. PubMed ID: 17846411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Effects of emotional face cueing on line bisection in neglect: a single case study.
    Tamietto M, Latini Corazzini L, Pia L, Zettin M, Gionco M, Geminiani G.
    Neurocase; 2005 Dec 11; 11(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 16393753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Pseudoneglect in schizophrenia: a line bisection study with cueing.
    Michel C, Cavezian C, d'Amato T, Dalery J, Rode G, Saoud M, Rossetti Y.
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2007 May 11; 12(3):222-34. PubMed ID: 17453903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R, Golay L.
    Brain Res; 2006 May 30; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.