These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 11237785

  • 41. NASCET percent stenosis semi-automated versus manual measurement on CTA.
    Lian K, White JH, Bartlett ES, Bharatha A, Aviv RI, Fox AJ, Symons SP.
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2012 May; 39(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 22547515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods.
    U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Cross JJ, Higgins NJ, Hollingworth W, Graves M, Joubert I, Kirkpatrick PJ, Antoun NM, Gillard JH.
    Stroke; 2004 Sep; 35(9):2083-8. PubMed ID: 15243149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials.
    AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Strickler DL, Alberts S, Young L.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 Jul; 12(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 9676932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Evaluating institutional variability of duplex scanning in the detection of carotid artery stenosis.
    Criswell BK, Langsfeld M, Tullis MJ, Marek J.
    Am J Surg; 1998 Dec; 176(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 9926796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. [Revision of DEGUM ultrasound criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenoses and transfer to NASCET measurement].
    Arning C, Widder B, von Reutern GM, Stiegler H, Görtler M.
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Jun; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 20414854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Complete MR angiography and Doppler ultrasound as the sole imaging modalities prior to carotid endarterectomy.
    Saouaf R, Grassi CJ, Hartnell GG, Wheeler H, Suojanen JN.
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Aug; 53(8):579-86. PubMed ID: 9744583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Challenges and Pitfalls in CT-Angiography Evaluation of Carotid Bulb Stenosis: Is It Time for a Reappraisal?
    Pierro A, Modugno P, Iezzi R, Cilla S.
    Life (Basel); 2022 Oct 22; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36362834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial?
    Gagne PJ, Matchett J, MacFarland D, Hauer-Jensen M, Barone GW, Eidt JF, Barnes RW.
    J Vasc Surg; 1996 Sep 22; 24(3):449-55; discussion 455-6. PubMed ID: 8808967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. [Evaluation of carotid stenosis by using carotid ultrasonography].
    Seike N, Ito M, Yasaka M.
    Brain Nerve; 2010 Dec 22; 62(12):1277-84. PubMed ID: 21139180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.