These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev; 2016 Feb 09; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The handsearching of 2 medical journals of Bahrain for reports of randomized controlled trials. Al-Hajeri AA, Fedorowicz Z, Amin FA, Eisinga A. Saudi Med J; 2006 Apr 09; 27(4):526-30. PubMed ID: 16598332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Wieland LS, Coles B, Weightman AL. Syst Rev; 2013 Sep 25; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes. Royle PL, Bain L, Waugh NR. Diabet Med; 2005 Oct 25; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns? Stevinson C, Lawlor DA. Complement Ther Med; 2004 Dec 25; 12(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15649836 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Royle P, Waugh N. Health Technol Assess; 2003 Dec 25; 7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51. PubMed ID: 14609481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review. Crumley ET, Wiebe N, Cramer K, Klassen TP, Hartling L. BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Aug 10; 5():24. PubMed ID: 16092960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? Aagaard T, Lund H, Juhl C. BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov 22; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying additional studies for a systematic review of retention strategies in randomised controlled trials: making contact with trials units and trial methodologists. Brueton V, Tierney JF, Stenning S, Rait G. Syst Rev; 2017 Aug 22; 6(1):167. PubMed ID: 28830570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A Critical Review of Search Strategies Used in Recent Systematic Reviews Published in Selected Prosthodontic and Implant-Related Journals: Are Systematic Reviews Actually Systematic? Layton D. Int J Prosthodont; 2017 Aug 22; 30(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 28085971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies. Royle P, Waugh N. BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul 23; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching. Sood A, Sood R, Bauer BA, Ebbert JO. J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Aug 23; 11(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 16131298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]