These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
141 related items for PubMed ID: 11244427
1. Changes in the TMJ disc-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Arat ZM, Gökalp H, Erdem D, Erden I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 11244427 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study. Aras A, Ada E, Saracoğlu H, Gezer NS, Aras I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 22051481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Disc-condyle Relationships during Class II Treatment with the Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA). Kinzinger G, Gülden N, Roth A, Diedrich P. J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Sep; 67(5):356-75. PubMed ID: 16953355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and magnetic resonance findings in the temporomandibular joints of patients before and after orthognathic surgery. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Santler G, Kärcher H, Simbrunner J. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 37(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10203221 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporomandibular joint effects of activator treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical study. Ruf S, Wüsten B, Pancherz H. Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):527-40. PubMed ID: 12518944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of the temporomandibular joint structure following mandibular advancement]. Shi JJ, Zeng XL. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 42(11):665-8. PubMed ID: 18307923 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of positional relationship between the disk and condyle in asymptomatic young adult mandibular prognathism. Gökalp H. Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 14580023 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Does bite-jumping damage the TMJ? A prospective longitudinal clinical and MRI study of Herbst patients. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):183-99. PubMed ID: 10926428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Herbst appliance therapy and temporomandibular joint disc position: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Aidar LA, Abrahão M, Yamashita HK, Dominguez GC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 16627174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporomandibular joint adaptations following two-phase therapy: an MRI study. Wadhawan N, Kumar S, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Sharma R. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 18950321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment. Serbesis-Tsarudis C, Pancherz H. Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18298212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Topography and morphology of the mandibular condyle during fixed functional orthopedic treatment --a magnetic resonance imaging study. Kinzinger G, Kober C, Diedrich P. J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Mar; 68(2):124-47. PubMed ID: 17372710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the condyle-fossa relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study (Part I). Kinzinger GS, Roth A, Gülden N, Bücker A, Diedrich PR. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 16940482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporomandibular joint disc position and configuration in children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Pellizoni SE, Salioni MA, Juliano Y, Guimarães AS, Alonso LG. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):785-93. PubMed ID: 16769497 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between temporomandibular joint disc morphology and stress angulation in skeletal Class III patients. Ueki K, Nakagawa K, Marukawa K, Takatsuka S, Yamamoto E. Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16024561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging of the condylar growth pattern and disk position after chin cup therapy: a preliminary study. Gökalp H, Kurt G. Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):568-75. PubMed ID: 16097225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporomandibular joint evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging in children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite, treated with rapid maxillary expansion. Masi M, Lederman HM, Yamashita HK, de Arruda Aidar LA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 19651350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Chavan SJ, Bhad WA, Doshi UH. Prog Orthod; 2014 Oct 01; 15(1):57. PubMed ID: 25329768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective study of Twin-block appliance therapy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Chintakanon K, Sampson W, Wilkinson T, Townsend G. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov 01; 118(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 11094363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Disk position and temporomandibular joint structure associated with mandibular setback in mandibular asymmetry patients. Kawakami M, Yamamoto K, Inoue T, Kajihara A, Fujimoto M, Kirita T. Angle Orthod; 2009 May 01; 79(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 19413383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]