These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


149 related items for PubMed ID: 11281281

  • 1. The triangle test statistic (TTS): a test of genetic homogeneity using departure from the triangle constraints in IBD distribution among affected sib-pairs.
    Dizier MH, Quesneville H, Prum B, Selinger-Leneman H, Clerget-Darpoux F.
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 64(Pt 5):433-42. PubMed ID: 11281281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Departure from the triangle constraints in discordant sib pairs: a test for genetic heterogeneity.
    Quesneville H, Dizier MH, Clerget-Darpoux F.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():S685-9. PubMed ID: 10597514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M, Strauch K.
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH, Selinger-Leneman H, Genin E.
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A normalized identity-by-state statistic for linkage analysis of sib pairs.
    Nemesure BB, He Q, Mendell NR.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999 Jul; 17 Suppl 1():S673-7. PubMed ID: 10597512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of 'model-free' and 'model-based' linkage statistics in the presence of locus heterogeneity: single data set and multiple data set applications.
    Huang J, Vieland VJ.
    Hum Hered; 2001 Jul; 51(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 11287743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A joint test of linkage and gene x environment interaction, with affected sib pairs.
    Gauderman WJ, Morrison JL, Siegmund KD, Thomas DC.
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999 Jul; 17 Suppl 1():S563-8. PubMed ID: 10597493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Analysis of affected sib pairs, with covariates--with and without constraints.
    Greenwood CM, Bull SB.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Mar; 64(3):871-85. PubMed ID: 10053022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Robustness and power of the maximum-likelihood-binomial and maximum-likelihood-score methods, in multipoint linkage analysis of affected-sibship data.
    Abel L, Müller-Myhsok B.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Aug; 63(2):638-47. PubMed ID: 9683590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Triangle test statistic in discordant sib pairs: test of genetic heterogeneity of asthma and atopy in CSGA families.
    Dizier MH, Babron MC.
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Aug; 21 Suppl 1():S192-7. PubMed ID: 11793668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Indication of linkage and genetic heterogeneity for asthma and atopy on chromosomes 8p and 12q in 107 French EGEA families.
    Dizier MH, Quesneville H, Besse-Schmittler C, Guilloud-Bataille M, Selinger-Leneman H, Clerget-Darpoux F, Demenais F.
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2003 Aug; 11(8):590-6. PubMed ID: 12891379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Consanguinity and the sib-pair method: an approach using identity by descent between and within individuals.
    Génin E, Clerget-Darpoux F.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Nov; 59(5):1149-62. PubMed ID: 8900245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
    Schaid DJ, Elston RC, Tran L, Wilson AF.
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Impact of parental relationships in maximum lod score affected sib-pair method.
    Leutenegger AL, Génin E, Thompson EA, Clerget-Darpoux F.
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Nov; 23(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 12432507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Heterogeneity in IBD allele sharing among covariate-defined subgroups: issues and findings for affected relatives.
    Bull SB, Mirea L, Briollais L, Logan AG.
    Hum Hered; 2003 Nov; 56(1-3):94-106. PubMed ID: 14614243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A test statistic to detect errors in sib-pair relationships.
    Ehm M, Wagner M.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Jan; 62(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 9443861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B, Tierney C, McGorray SP, Day NE.
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs.
    Guo X, Elston RC.
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 10642424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Likelihood-ratio affected sib-pair tests applied to multiply affected sibships: issues of power and type I error rate.
    Holmans P.
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11119296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The null distribution of the heterogeneity lod score does depend on the assumed genetic model for the trait.
    Huang J, Vieland VJ.
    Hum Hered; 2001 Jan; 52(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 11713418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.