These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

115 related items for PubMed ID: 11293898

  • 1. Quality assurance in gynecologic cytology. The value of cytotechnologist-cytopathologist discrepancy logs.
    Cibas ES, Dean B, Maffeo N, Allred EN.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Apr; 115(4):512-6. PubMed ID: 11293898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Agreement between cytotechnologists and cytopathologists as a new measure of cytopathologist performance in gynecologic cytology.
    Quinn AM, Minhajuddin AT, Hynan LS, Reisch JS, Cibas ES.
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Jul; 125(7):576-580. PubMed ID: 28346747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A quality control study on cytotechnologist-cytopathologist concordance and its relationship to the number of dots on the slide.
    Bongiovanni M, De Saussure B, Kumar N, Pache JC, Cibas ES.
    Acta Cytol; 2009 Jul; 53(6):653-8. PubMed ID: 20014554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessing laboratory employee competence.
    Boone DJ.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Feb; 124(2):190-1. PubMed ID: 10656723
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Exploring avenues for best use of cytotechnologists in non-gynaecological cytology: Double screening or independent sign-out.
    Fischer G, Haddad M, Cormier K.
    Cytopathology; 2018 Feb; 29(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 28914465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Discrepancy analysis, communication, and feedback for cytotechnologist quality improvement of nongynecologic cytopathology.
    Whigham P, Ilario MJ, Flanagan MB, Mauser N, Raab SS, Ohori NP.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Apr; 34(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 16544333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A peer comparison program for the quality assurance of human papillomavirus DNA detection using the Digene Hybrid Capture II/SurePath method shows excellent analytic interlaboratory correlation.
    Kuebler DL, Illingworth A, Blenc AM, Wilbur DC.
    Cancer; 2007 Oct 25; 111(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 17879373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. 100% rapid (partial) rescreening for quality assurance.
    Lemay C, Meisels A.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 Oct 25; 43(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 9987456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. ASC/SIL ratio for cytotechnologists: A survey of its utility in clinical practice.
    Renshaw AA, Auger M, Birdsong G, Cibas ES, Henry M, Hughes JH, Moriarty A, Tench W, Wilbur DC, Elsheikh TM.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Mar 25; 38(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 19760762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The role of monitoring interpretive rates, concordance between cytotechnologist and pathologist interpretations before sign-out, and turnaround time in gynecologic cytology quality assurance: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 1.
    Clary KM, Davey DD, Naryshkin S, Austin RM, Thomas N, Chmara BA, Sugrue C, Tworek J.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb 25; 137(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 23368858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Controls in quality assessment in gynecologic cytology: A rational approach to workload limits for the ThinPrep imaging system.
    Renshaw AA, Elsheikh TM.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Oct 25; 38(10):772-5. PubMed ID: 20091901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [The European aptitude test for cervical cytopathology].
    Branca M.
    Pathologica; 2001 Feb 25; 93(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 11294016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. How expert are the experts? Implications for proficiency testing in cervicovaginal cytology.
    Ducatman BS, Ducatman AM.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 May 25; 129(5):604-5. PubMed ID: 15859628
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
    Bishop JW, Kaufman RH, Taylor DA.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 May 25; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Determining the utility and effectiveness of the NeoPath AutoPap 300 QC System used routinely.
    Fetterman B, Pawlick G, Koo H, Hartinger J, Gilbert C, Connell S.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 May 25; 43(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 9987444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Employee competence and performance-based assessment: A college of American pathologists Q-probes study of larboratory personnel in 522 institutions.
    Howanitz PJ, Valenstein PN, Fine G.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Feb 25; 124(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 10656726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire.
    Crothers BA, Darragh TM, Tambouret RH, Nayar R, Barkan GA, Zhao C, Booth CN, Padmanabhan V, Tabatabai ZL, Souers RJ, Thomas N, Wilbur DC, Moriarty AT.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Jan 25; 140(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 26046490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. General quality practices in gynecologic cytopathology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3.
    Tworek J, Nayar R, Savaloja L, Tabbara S, Thomas N, Winkler B, Howell LP.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb 25; 137(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 23368861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.