These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
123 related items for PubMed ID: 11296775
1. Advances in EDC testing. J Environ Monit; 2000 Dec; 2(6):97N. PubMed ID: 11296775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Canada and US focus on hormone disrupters. J Environ Monit; 1999 Feb; 1(1):12N. PubMed ID: 11529071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientists criticise EDC list. J Environ Monit; 2000 Dec; 2(6):96N. PubMed ID: 11296772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of an integrated testing strategy to the U.S. EPA endocrine disruptor screening program. Willett CE, Bishop PL, Sullivan KM. Toxicol Sci; 2011 Sep; 123(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 21642633 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Precautionary principle for toxic chemicals - no alternative to safeguard societal benefits. Jostmann T. Hum Exp Toxicol; 2007 Nov; 26(11):847-9; discussion 875-6. PubMed ID: 18042578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NRC: not enough data. Greene LA. Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Jan; 108(1):A16. PubMed ID: 10691362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US panel split on endocrine disruptors.. Macilwain C. Nature; 1998 Oct 29; 395(6705):828. PubMed ID: 9804404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rising hormones. Sharpe M. J Environ Monit; 1999 Feb 29; 1(1):5N-7N. PubMed ID: 11529081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and human reproduction: fact or fiction? Burdorf A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Oct 29; 43(7):435-7. PubMed ID: 10582026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Introduction to "screening for endocrine activity-experiences with the US EPA's endocrine disruptor screening program and future considerations". Marty S. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2014 Feb 29; 101(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24510782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose-response relationships for endocrine disruptors: what we know and what we don't know. Lucier GW. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Aug 29; 26(1 Pt 1):34-5. PubMed ID: 9339476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Endocrine disruption: historical perspectives and its impact on the future of toxicology testing. Marty MS, Carney EW, Rowlands JC. Toxicol Sci; 2011 Mar 29; 120 Suppl 1():S93-108. PubMed ID: 20974704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Worldwide progress on chemical assessment. J Environ Monit; 1999 Jun 29; 1(3):42N. PubMed ID: 11529118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Health effects classification and its role in the derivation of minimal risk levels: reproductive and endocrine effects. Pohl HR, Luukinen B, Holler JS. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul 29; 42(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 15921838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hormesis, non-linearity, and risk communication. Calabrese E. Hum Exp Toxicol; 2009 Jan 29; 28(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 19411553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Endocrine disrupters as a public health issue. Carpenter H. Minn Med; 2003 Jan 29; 86(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 12585556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a model organism for investigating endocrine disruption. Segner H. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar 29; 149(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 18955160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. US introduces consolidated regs. J Environ Monit; 2000 Dec 29; 2(6):93N-94N. PubMed ID: 11296765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Frogs put in the gender blender by America's favourite herbicide. Dalton R. Nature; 2002 Apr 18; 416(6882):665-6. PubMed ID: 11961511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]